Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KY State Senate OKs Putting Gay Marriage Ban to a Vote {for Nov. 2, but House Balks}
Lexington, KY, Herald-Leader ^ | 03-12-04 | Cheves, John

Posted on 03/12/2004 3:46:10 AM PST by Theodore R.

State Senate OKs putting gay marriage ban to a vote

By John Cheves

HERALD-LEADER STAFF WRITER

FRANKFORT - As expected, the Senate overwhelmingly voted yesterday to put a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriages on the Nov. 2 ballot.

Senate Bill 245 goes to the House, where leaders say they are not inclined to send the controversial proposal to the House floor for a vote.

"We already have a law that bans same-sex marriages, and we have recently passed a resolution urging Congress to amend the U.S. Constitution against same-sex marriages. In my opinion, the House has pretty well expressed its view," House Majority Leader Rocky Adkins, D-Sandy Hook, said this week.

Nationally and in Kentucky, Democrats complain that Republicans are using gay-marriage bans as a political "wedge" issue that divides voters and forces Democrats to alienate either supporters or opponents of gay rights.

The Kentucky House's shrinking Democratic majority -- two-thirds of its Democrats face a Republican challenger this year -- fought off a Republican effort last month to call a House version of the gay-marriage amendment for a floor vote. That House bill was withdrawn.

Yesterday, in a Senate floor speech, the sponsor of SB 245 urged his colleagues in the Republican-led chamber to honor "the greater glory of God" and vote for it.

"I'm a firm believer in the Bible," said Sen. Vernie McGaha, R-Russell Springs.

McGaha quoted portions of the Bible defining marriage as between a man and a woman; then he warned about recent court rulings and decisions by local governments in other states to sanction gay and lesbian weddings.

"This institution of marriage is under attack by judges and elected officials who would legislate social policy," McGaha said. "We in the legislature, I think, have no other choice but to protect our communities from the desecration of these traditional values. We must stand strong."

The legislature's only openly gay member, Sen. Ernesto Scorsone, failed to rally much opposition.

Scorsone, D-Lexington, warned the other senators they would come to regret voting for the bill, much as a previous generation of Kentucky legislators later realized they were wrong to oppose equal rights for blacks.

Scorsone drew a parallel between yesterday's vote and a racist, religiously inspired effort in 1912 to amend the U.S. Constitution so that marriages between whites and blacks would not be recognized. In both cases, he said, supporters of the amendments insisted they had to defend the sanctity of marriage.

"At some point in time -- and that time is not that far off -- people will look back and wonder how good public servants could support an amendment such as Senate Bill 245," Scorsone said.

In 1998, the legislature wrote a "one man, one woman" definition of marriage into state law. But state laws can be overturned by a court decision if judges decide they violate the state constitution's guarantees of freedom and civil liberties.

If SB 245 were approved, voters would decide this fall whether to amend the constitution to ban same-sex marriages in Kentucky, putting the issue above the reach of the courts.

The amendment also would prohibit Kentucky from recognizing same-sex marriages or civil unions made legal outside Kentucky.

Congress is considering a similar gay-marriage amendment to the U.S. Constitution, endorsed by President Bush. But that could take years, and in the interim, "a radical Kentucky judge" could strike down Kentucky's law, warned Sen. Gary Tapp, R-Shelbyville.

Thirty-three senators voted for the bill, including Sen. Daniel Mongiardo, D-Hazard, who is running for the Democratic nomination in this year's U.S. Senate race.

Opposing the bill were Scorsone; Sen. Lindy Casebier, R-Louisville; Sen. David Karem, D-Louisville; and Sen. Tim Shaughnessy, D-Louisville. Sen. Gerald Neal, D-Louisville, voted to pass on the bill.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: bible; civilunion; danielmongiardo; frankfort; garytapp; ky; kyhouse; kysenate; liberalism; marriage; rockyadkins; samesexmarriages; verniemcgaha

1 posted on 03/12/2004 3:46:11 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
What idiots.

Nevil Chamberlan accepted Hilter's expression for piece.

How man people got a bullet in the gut thanks to some politician "expresssing" a goal instead of acting.
2 posted on 03/12/2004 3:49:08 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Brief history of gay (same-sex) marriages:
-----------------
1989: Denmark was the first country to grant civil partnership to gay couples.
-----------------
09/00: Dutch legalize same-sex marriages.
01/03: Belgium begins to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
06/10/03: Ontario (Canada) begins to issue same-sex marriage licenses in the province.
07/08/03: British Columbia (Canada) begins to issue same-sex marriage licenses.
11/03: MA Supreme Court orders MA to issue same-sex marriages licenses from 05/17/04.
02/12/04: SF County, CA begins to issue same-sex marriage licenses.
02/20/04: Sandoval County, NM issues same-sex marriage licenses for one day.
02/20/04 (P.M): NM AG rules same-sex marriages are illegal under NM laws.
02/27/04: New Paltz, NY Mayor begins to perform same-sex marriage ceremonies.
03/03/04: NY AG rules same-sex marriages are illegal under NY laws.
03/03/04: Multnomah County (Portland), OR begins to issue same-sex marriage licenses.
03/05/04: NY Judge bars New Paltz Mayor from performing same-sex marriages for a month.
03/06/04: In New Paltz, NY same-sex marriage ceremonies continue under Unitarian Pastor.
03/07/04: Seattle, WA Mayor to recognize gay marriages from other places.
03/08/04: Asbury Park, NJ Deputy Mayor issues marriage license to a gay couple.
03/09/04: NJ AG demands an halt to same-sex marriages or face criminal charges.
03/09/04: SJ, CA to recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere for it's city workers.
03/11/04: SF County,CA halts issuing same-sex marriage licenses per order of CA Supreme Court.
Which country/state/county will be next?
3 posted on 03/12/2004 4:17:05 AM PST by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Just listening to the story of Rosie. We get up just like everyone else, feed the kids, get them off to school, just like other married couples. Of course she forgot to mention that she and her partner are both female. Yes, Rosie, there is a difference.
4 posted on 03/12/2004 5:01:17 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson