Experts find Federal Funding COVERS Cost of No Child Left Behind (dems are saddened)

Hoover Inst. ^ | 2/12/04 | unknown

[GailA]

Experts find Federal Funding Covers Cost of No Child Left Behind

STANFORD—Contrary to claims by critics that the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is a seriously unfunded federal mandate, two Massachusetts public officials report sufficient funding for its effective implementation.

In their analysis, to be published in the February issue of Education Next, Massachusetts State School Board chairman James Peyser and economist Robert Costrell find that:

[GailA]

FYI

[LowCountryJoe]

I can just hear the complaints now. They're a partisan group...blah...blah...blah

[Nasty McPhilthy]

Considering all of the uproar surrounding our supposedly having been mislead by the administration's rush to war, why doesn't GW point out how, and by who, we are truly being mislead and lied to by?

[Jeff Chandler]

What the Bush administration doesn't seem to grasp is the fact that not only will he get no political credit for his liberal expansion of government, the rats will lie about it and make every expansion appear as a cut.

[talleyman]

Satan is the Father of Lies - Satan is a Democrat.

[GailA]

btt

[zook]

bump

[fml]

bump

[StriperSniper]

The estimated cost of testing required by NCLB runs no more than $20 per tested student, a small fraction of average per pupil costs in the United States ($7,392 in 2000, the last year for which official statistics are available).

Who are the misleaders?

[OXENinFLA]

The estimated cost of testing required by NCLB runs no more than $20 per tested student, a small fraction of average per pupil costs in the United States ($7,392 in 2000, the last year for which official statistics are available).....................Ping

---

Freepmail me if you want on/off this ping list.

[OXENinFLA]

two Massachusetts public officials report sufficient funding for its effective implementation.

And there from MASS!!!! JKIDS