Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Cheeseburger Bill" shielding restaurants from lawsuits passes House
Yahoo! News ^ | 3/10/04 | AFP - Washington

Posted on 03/10/2004 6:42:15 PM PST by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON (AFP) -

Paunchy Americans should consider diets or health clubs, because suing restaurants over fatty fare will be off the menu if a bill the US House of Representatives passed becomes law.

The House voted 236-139 for the so-called "Cheeseburger Bill," which would shield restaurants and food producers from Americans who put on weight with junk food and then take legal action over the negative health consequences.

The bill's author, Republican representative Ric Keller of Florida, argued that such lawsuits are not only frivolous, but harmful to the US economy.

"We're talking about protecting the single largest private-sector employer in the United States that provides 12 million jobs," Keller said, commenting on the Personal Responsibility in Food Consumption Act.

"The gist of this legislation is that there should be common sense in the food court, not blaming other people in the legal court," Keller said.

Support for the bill divided largely along party lines, with Democrats saying the bill is a gift to the food industry, and Republicans decrying obesity lawsuits as an abuse by money-grubbing trial lawyers.

"The judicial system is being used by industrious law firms and plaintiffs' lawyers who sue without repercussion," Ohio Republican Bob Ney said from the House floor. "These insane and crazy lawsuits are absolutely not the way."

Massachusetts Democrat James McGovern insisted, however, that the legislation is unnecessary because such suits are rarely are allowed to proceed very far in the court system.

"All these insane, crazy lawsuits that people are referring to are getting dismissed," he said.

The first fast food lawsuit in the United States was filed in 2002 by an overweight New York man who blamed his frequent visits to McDonald's for his obesity and diabetes.

Since then, there has been of deluge of such litigation and growing concern by industry advocates that the pace of such litigation could quicken.

Opponents of the bill said it absolves the food industry of responsibility for its role in one of the most serious health crises facing the United States.

"This bill says to the restaurant industry and the food industry, you don't have any responsibility ... to our kids and the types of products you try to peddle to them," McGovern said.

A study the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (news - web sites) (CDC) released Tuesday found that obsesity-related diseases would top smoking as the leading cause of preventable death among Americans by 2005.

Almost 130 million Americans, or 64 percent of the population, are overweight or obese, and the problem is increasing across the board, including many children fond of greasy, high-calorie, fast-food meals.

And recent data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey showed that 15.5 percent of children were seriously overweight and 15 percent more were at risk of becoming so -- three times the rate of a generation ago.

Total direct and indirect costs of obesity, including health care and lost productivity, were estimated at 117 billion dollars nationally in 2000, according to US statistics.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: cheeseburgerbill; foodpolice; lawsuits; passeshouse; restaurants; shielding; tortreform; triallawyers
Ronald McDonald, mascot of US fast food giant McDonalds, stands in front of a line of patrons at a McDonalds booth in Los Angeles.  Paunchy Americans should consider diets or health clubs, because suing restaurants over fatty fare will be off the menu if a bill Congress debated becomes law.(AFP/File/Hector Mata)

Ronald McDonald, mascot of US fast food giant McDonalds, stands in front of a line of patrons at a McDonalds booth in Los Angeles. Paunchy Americans should consider diets or health clubs, because suing restaurants over fatty fare will be off the menu if a bill Congress debated becomes law.(AFP/File/Hector Mata)


1 posted on 03/10/2004 6:42:16 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The Senate dems will load the Bill with ammendments and then vote against it.
2 posted on 03/10/2004 6:46:11 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Despise not the jester. Often he is the only one telling the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Good. It's about SELF-RESPONSIBILITY and NOT relying on a NANNY-STATE.

To all Fatsos: Don't blame McDonald for your personal shortcomings.
3 posted on 03/10/2004 6:46:16 PM PST by Bismarck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; Carry_Okie; forester; sasquatch; B4Ranch; SierraWasp; hedgetrimmer; knews_hound; ...
Short list.
4 posted on 03/10/2004 6:48:18 PM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Cheeseburger Bill. Firearm Liability Bill.

Whatever.

How about we stop cherry-picking and just pass complete and dramatic tort reform?
5 posted on 03/10/2004 6:55:58 PM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"Cheeseburger Bill"

6 posted on 03/10/2004 6:56:04 PM PST by Charles Henrickson (Buns on the Run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"Cheeseburger Bill" sounds like a nickname for Beelzebubba.
7 posted on 03/10/2004 6:57:07 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby
How about we stop cherry-picking and just pass complete and dramatic tort reform?

Worth repeating.

8 posted on 03/10/2004 7:01:08 PM PST by TankerKC (My life is a Country Song.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Republicans decrying obesity lawsuits as an abuse by money-grubbing trial lawyers.

The problem is not the lawyers, the problem is the juries.
If juries would stop convicting companies for serving hot coffee too hot, for for serving a hamburger without tofu and tree bark on it, then the lawyers would laugh at the people who bring these suits.

9 posted on 03/10/2004 7:09:24 PM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
there should be mandatory trigger locks on every SUPER SIZE Happy Meal sold.
10 posted on 03/10/2004 7:19:32 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Golly, our elected officials can actually see that laying personal responsibility on the individual for "picking up a fat burger and inserting into mouth results in consequences of their own choices."
Well, picking up a gun and pulling the trigger some how misses this mark of personal responsibility to many of the same legislators. Go figure.
11 posted on 03/10/2004 7:25:09 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Next up is the "Dumbass Bill" where people can't sue because they are too damn stupid to run their own lives.

The proposed legislation will protect alcohol and tobacco companies, businesses with ice and snow in front of their store during winter, makers and servers of hot coffee, business that refuse to hire ugly cross-dressing crackheads with chronic body odor, stewardesses who use "eenie-meenie-minie-moe", coaches who cut players that suck at sports, and the makers of Coca-Cola from being sued by morons claiming it caused their diabetes.

12 posted on 03/10/2004 7:31:03 PM PST by Ophiucus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
They can shield restaurants from frivolous lawsuits but they can't protect the gun manufacturers. What a crock! I'm glad that restaurants are protected, don't get me wrong, it's just that I'm sick to death of our sorry congresscritters double standards when it comes to guns.
13 posted on 03/10/2004 7:37:18 PM PST by NRA2BFree (The Socialists are in control of our Congress. It's time to clean house!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
It's not the consumers fault, it's that evil Ronald -- suing him is just not enough...


14 posted on 03/10/2004 7:50:11 PM PST by mikrofon (NOTE: Fast food can lead to early death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
The real answer to this and many other problems is simple,
LOSER PAYS..
15 posted on 03/10/2004 7:51:47 PM PST by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Protection for sale. Get your industry protected. Protection for sale.
16 posted on 03/10/2004 8:55:03 PM PST by prolusion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!
17 posted on 03/11/2004 3:08:54 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
When this makes it to the senate I foresee a few amendments being attached, like:
1) The cop killer donut amendment
2) The .30 caliber french-fry law
3) And an amendment to close the 'street vendor' loop hole.

As such, the American Restaurant Assn will pull it's support and this bill will die a slow death.

18 posted on 03/11/2004 5:35:15 AM PST by Condor51 ("Diplomacy without arms is like music without instruments." -- Frederick the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson