Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA 'Corrected" Cheney's Allegations On Iraq
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 3-11-2004 | David Rennie

Posted on 03/10/2004 5:56:27 PM PST by blam

CIA 'corrected' Cheney's allegations on Iraq

By David Rennie in Washington
(Filed: 11/03/2004)

George Tenet, the Central Intelligence Agency chief, has cautioned Vice-President Dick Cheney about apparently overblown statements on Iraq and plans to do so again, he has revealed.

Under fierce questioning from Democrats in the Senate, Mr Tenet said some of the most alarming allegations made by Mr Cheney and other administration leaders before and after the war did not reflect the consensus view of the intelligence community. He told the Senate Armed Services Committee of three occasions on which he had privately intervened to correct President George W Bush and Mr Cheney, or would be doing so.

"When I believed that someone was misconstruing intelligence I said something about it," said Mr Tenet, a Clinton appointment many Republicans believe should take the lion's share of the blame for faulty pre-war intelligence. He gave, as an example, the 2002 State of the Union address in which Mr Bush cited British fears that Saddam Hussein was trying to obtain uranium from Africa. He had "intervened" after that speech to object to the uranium claim.

Mr Tenet said he had called Mr Cheney after a January radio interview in which the vice-president claimed that the discovery of two lorry trailers, thought by some to be mobile biological weapons, offered "conclusive" proof that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction programmes. Mr Tenet said he had told Mr Cheney there was "no consensus in our intelligence community" about the true purpose of the trailers.

At least one more correction call lay ahead of Mr Tenet, he revealed, concerning a highly disputed memorandum claiming to prove collaboration between Saddam's regime and al-Qa'eda, sent to the Senate by a senior Pentagon official, Douglas Feith.

Mr Tenet said his agency "did not agree with the way the data was characterised" in Mr Feith's memorandum, which was leaked later to a conservative news magazine, The Weekly Standard.

Yet in a January newspaper interview Mr Cheney praised the article and recommended Mr Feith's memorandum as "your best source of information" on links between Iraq and al-Qa'eda.

Mr Tenet said he had only learned of Mr Cheney's January interview this week. "I will talk to him about it," he vowed.

Asked by Senator Edward Kennedy, the Massachusetts Democrat, if he believed the Bush administration had distorted information to justify the Iraq war, he replied: "No, Sir, I don't."

The exchanges shone a harsh light once more on the unique role played by Mr Cheney, the most powerful hawk in the Bush administration.

Before the war he went further in public than other senior figures in his claims on Iraq. In August 2002 he said Saddam had a nuclear capability that could directly threaten "anyone he chooses, in his own region, or beyond". In March last year, six days before the US-led invasion, Mr Cheney said: "We believe Iraq has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons."

Since the war he has advanced theories and claims that other members of the administration have abandoned, ranging from the disputed mobile weapons laboratories to the purported meeting in Prague between an Iraqi intelligence agent and the September 11 hijacker Mohammed Atta.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allegations; cheney; cheneys; cia; corrected; iraq; prewarintelligence

1 posted on 03/10/2004 5:56:28 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
Outrageous nonsense. The "quote" about Iraq having reconstituted nuclear weapons was a misspeak in an appearance where he repeatedly said he was referring to the nuclear program, not weapons.
2 posted on 03/10/2004 6:07:34 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The question that was not asked...

Does the CIA know all the INTEL that the President and Vice President know?

There are other sources of INTEL than the CIA.

3 posted on 03/10/2004 6:12:06 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
"There are other sources of INTEL than the CIA."

Hmmm, hadn't thought of that.

4 posted on 03/10/2004 6:21:29 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
....consensus view of the intelligence community

The "public" intelligence community is a sham. Real intelligence comes from other sources lead by DIA, who don't share with the State Department leaning CIA. I'll ride with the Dickster before that blob Tenent. What a token dork he is.

5 posted on 03/10/2004 6:23:40 PM PST by leadhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
Just another PROPAGANDA hit piece on the US.
Europa getting to a serious matter, with all this Evil America PROPAGANDA.
The Brain-washing of Europa.
6 posted on 03/10/2004 6:24:07 PM PST by jungleboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
not really
7 posted on 03/10/2004 6:30:38 PM PST by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: leadhead
"The "public" intelligence community is a sham."

May be, however, they seemed isolated from doing too much harm until they can be clean out from the previous administration.



"Real intelligence comes from other sources lead by DIA, who don't share with the State Department leaning CIA."

I agree that the real source of INTEL comes by the DIA and probably from a "special" group even within them.


"I'll ride with the Dickster before that blob Tenent. What a token dork he is."

For whatever reason the President and Vice Cheney do not seem to be to bothered by what ever Tenent does or says. There must be a reason for the allowance of such a public awareness of Tenent.
8 posted on 03/10/2004 6:42:26 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: camas
Not really --- What?
9 posted on 03/10/2004 6:43:39 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam
Tenets head should roll... Why!.. because hes an incompetent democrat Clinton appointee, Clinton would not have put him there if he had an sense.. That he was grilled by Kennedy was the only good thing.. being grilled like that by who you know to be an absolute moron must've hurt..<p.
Tenet is incompetent but not a moron..


10 posted on 03/10/2004 7:05:19 PM PST by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Why don't both Tenet and Cheney resign? The nation would be better off without them.
11 posted on 03/10/2004 7:16:34 PM PST by BrucefromMtVernon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BrucefromMtVernon
Because if you lose Cheney you lose the most effective Vice President in American history. He is the President's de facto chief of staff. He is our go to guy. Think of him as the Jim Baker of this administration.
12 posted on 03/10/2004 11:45:55 PM PST by nathanbedford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson