Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Images Reveal Deepest Glance Into Universe
NY Times ^ | March 10, 2004 | DENNIS OVERBYE

Posted on 03/10/2004 2:42:50 PM PST by neverdem

BALTIMORE, March 9 — Astronomers using the Hubble Space Telescope said Tuesday that they had reached far enough out in space and back in time to be within "a stone's throw" of the Big Bang itself.

In a ceremony that was part science workshop, part political rally and part starting gun for an astronomical gold rush, astronomers at the Space Telescope Science Institute on the Johns Hopkins University campus unveiled what they said was the deepest telescopic view into the universe ever obtained.

Along with detecting roughly 10,000 galaxies, the million-second exposure of a small patch of dark sky in the constellation Fornax captured objects a quarter as bright as previous surveys.

Several dozen faint reddish spots, the astronomers said, could even be infant galaxies just emerging from the "dark ages" that prevailed in the first half billion years after the Big Bang when stars were just beginning to form.

"We might have seen the end of the beginning," said Dr. Anton Koekemoer of the institute, who was part of the project.

He and others cautioned, however, that more work would be required before astronomers know if their surmises are correct. Astronomers will not be able to take a deeper picture until the James Webb Space Telescope goes into orbit in 2011.

When the new image, known officially as the Hubble Ultra Deep Field, has been studied, said Dr. Steven Beckwith, the director of the Space Telescope Science Institute, "we expect it to reveal new secrets to the origin of stars and galaxies, and ultimately ourselves."

The first bits of that work began with a frenzy Tuesday morning, when the space telescope institute simultaneously unveiled the images and made the raw data available to the world at hubblesite.org.

Before Tuesday morning, Dr. Beckwith said, only four people had seen the image and they had pledged among themselves not to work on it ahead of time, so as not to give the "home team" an advantage.

"I wanted it to be like the great land rush where the gun is fired and everybody takes off," said Dr. Beckwith, who devoted his discretionary budget toward the immense amount of telescope time needed for the project — 800 separate exposures spread out over four months.

The occasion also served as a reminder of the plight of the Hubble telescope, which is operating under a controversial death sentence.

Since 1990 it has floated above Earth's murky atmosphere, providing astronomers with peerless views of the heavens, with the help of periodic refurbishments by astronauts. But on Jan. 17, just one day after the Hubble had completed its ultra deep observations, NASA's administrator, Sean O'Keefe, said any space shuttle missions to the telescope would be too unsafe and canceled them, dooming Hubble to die in orbit within three years. The decision caused an outcry among scientists, the public and on Capitol Hill. In response to a protest by Sen. Barbara A. Mikulski, Democrat of Maryland, Mr. O'Keefe agreed to get a "second opinion" from Adm. Harold W. Gehman, who led an investigation into the loss of the shuttle Columbia last year. His response is expected soon.

Last week, Representative Mark Udall, Democrat of Colorado, and seven colleagues introduced a resolution in the House Science Committee calling on NASA to establish an independent panel to study the question.

The astronomers denied that Tuesday's event was timed to capitalize on the uproar over Hubble's fate — but Senator Mikulski walked in unannounced to the telescope institute today to applause, then helped pull the curtain to unveil the new picture. She declared she would not stop her efforts to save Hubble. "The future of the Hubble," she said to another round of applause, "should not be decided by one man in a NASA back room without a transparent process."

The ultra deep survey surpasses two earlier surveys, known as the Hubble Deep Fields, which revealed thousands of new galaxies dating back as far as when the universe was only a billion years old. Because light travels at a finite speed, the farther away a detected object is, the longer it has taken the light to get here.

Last week, astronomers using the Very Large Telescope at the European Southern Observatory in Chile said they had discovered a galaxy from when the galaxy was just 470 million years old. Its incredibly faint light had been amplified by the curvature of space around a giant cluster of galaxies. If confirmed, that would be the record.

But the ultra deep field has the sensitivity to reach back to galaxies when the universe was only 300 million years old, without the aid of any gravitational amplification. The Hubble thus opens to exploration the period of time from 300 million to 700 million years of age, when, theorists suggest, the first galaxies were burning themselves out of the murk that descended when the fires of the Big Bang cooled. Dr. Massimo Stiavelli, of the institute, called those years a crucial period in the early life, "a teething for the universe." He added, "Hubble takes us to within a stone's throw of the Big Bang itself."

The new survey actually has two parts: the million-second exposure with Hubble's new Advanced Camera for Surveys, installed in 2002, led by Dr. Stiavelli, and a shorter exposure of the same patch of sky with another camera sensitive to infrared light, the Near Infrared Camera and Multiobject Spectrometer, Nicmos, led by Dr. Roger Thompson of the University of Arizona. Another team, led by Dr. Sangeeta Malhotra of the institute, is still reducing data from a spectrograph on the Advanced Camera for Surveys, which will help astronomers eventually identify the distances and types of objects in the picture.

Like the earlier deep fields, the ultra deep field shows that the early universe was littered with galaxies of oddball shapes and colors, but astronomers homed in on a few dozen soft reddish dots, which appear on the Nicmos image but not on the visible-light image.

While these might turn out to be dim nearby stars known as brown dwarfs, some astronomers were excited about the possibility that they might be the most distant objects ever seen, galaxies just emerging from the dark ages. Because the universe is expanding, galaxies at great distances are being carried away at high speeds and their visible light is lengthened and stretched — "redshifted" in the jargon — to longer wavelengths. The farther away they are, the more of their light becomes infrared radiation. Galaxies when the universe was only 300 million years old would be moving so fast that all their light would be invisible infrared radiation.

If the red dots are distant galaxies, then the Hubble might finally have hit the wall. Hubble's successor, the Webb telescope is being built to observe infrared radiation in order to pursue such galaxies. "The dark ages are James Webb territory," said Dr. Thompson.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: bigbang; deepspace; hubble
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 03/10/2004 2:42:50 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
LOL! So, 470 million light years is now considered a 'stone's throw"?

Ooooookay. The Hubble is a great device. I hope it can remain in service. The deep field picture taken a few years back was incredible.

2 posted on 03/10/2004 2:47:57 PM PST by New Horizon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"We might have seen the end of the beginning,"

Hmmm....let me get back to you on that.
3 posted on 03/10/2004 2:51:25 PM PST by nuconvert (CAUTION: I'm an acquaintance of someone labelled :"an obstinate supporter of dangerous fantasies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
oooooh.... pretty....
4 posted on 03/10/2004 2:52:13 PM PST by birbear (I'll take Things Nobody Knows for $300, please, Alex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
>Astronomers using the Hubble Space Telescope said Tuesday that they had reached far enough out in space and back in time to be within "a stone's throw" of the Big Bang itself


5 posted on 03/10/2004 2:54:35 PM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

6 posted on 03/10/2004 3:22:18 PM PST by wolicy_ponk (If con is the opposite of pro, is congress the opposite of progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolicy_ponk
LOL
7 posted on 03/10/2004 3:29:59 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

8 posted on 03/10/2004 3:34:00 PM PST by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Perhaps we'll see back far enough to photograph the Creator...


9 posted on 03/10/2004 3:39:56 PM PST by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Nice pic, but that wasn't the one from the Times story, right? BTW, how do you take pics from the web?
10 posted on 03/10/2004 4:26:04 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I think that was the pic in the Times article. I found it on Yahoo News Photos (search: Hubble).

When you see a pic on a website, right click on your mouse, go to "Properties"; highlight and copy the Address/URL of the pic; come back to FR and do the HTML coding which is [img src="insert the URL here"] -- except use the < mark to bracket the beginning of the HTML command, and the > mark to close it, rather than the [ and ] marks....if you know what I mean.

11 posted on 03/10/2004 4:41:58 PM PST by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: New Horizon
I hope it can remain in service.

People risk their lives for all sorts of stupid things - driving cars around in circles as fast as they can for example - so it seems quite reasonable to allow them to try to save the Hubble.

12 posted on 03/10/2004 5:04:07 PM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Go back to the Big Bang when it was very small and put a candle snuffer over it. No more jihadists. No more anything else either, but there's always a tradeoff.
13 posted on 03/10/2004 5:08:36 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Thanks a lot for the info. I wrote it out longhand in the hope that I will remember more it easily. I'll try with this story.
14 posted on 03/10/2004 6:00:11 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Oh no! Another DOBS (deepest, oldest, biggest, smallest) thread.
15 posted on 03/10/2004 6:02:22 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Consort
Oh no! Another DOBS (deepest, oldest, biggest, smallest) thread.

LOL. I did enjoy the tidbit that some of the objects are perceived with light intensity of 1 photon per minute! That is amazing.

16 posted on 03/10/2004 6:04:21 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
I tried, but a X within a box within a larger box appeared when I previewed. Does that mean it's copyrighted or what happened?
17 posted on 03/10/2004 6:12:28 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

18 posted on 03/11/2004 11:07:30 AM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
PING
19 posted on 04/02/2004 2:18:23 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Hey looks like you got it. good job.
20 posted on 04/02/2004 2:29:42 PM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson