Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada's Job Growth Soars Past U.S.
The Globe and Mail ^ | January 10, 2004 | Bruce Little

Posted on 03/10/2004 2:38:06 PM PST by Paul Ross

workopolis.com

Canada's job growth soars past U.S.

Numbers raise doubts over strength of economic recovery south of the border

BRUCE LITTLE - ECONOMICS REPORTER
Saturday, January 10, 2004

The red-hot Canadian employment market churned out an eye-popping 53,000 new jobs in December, in stark contrast to the United States, which added an anemic 1,000 bodies to the payrolls, raising doubts about the staying power of the economic recovery there.

The jump in December employment in Canada capped a frenzy of job creation through the latter part of 2003 that outpaced anything seen in more than two decades.

The Statistics Canada report yesterday -- which blew away economists' forecasts -- spurred the dollar to new heights, driving it ever closer to the 80 cent (U.S.) mark, a level last seen in March, 1993. The dollar rocketed up 0.58 cents (U.S.) to 78.67 cents yesterday.

In another sign that the economy remains robust, construction on new homes steamed ahead in 2003, with housing starts hitting a 15-year high, according to Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp.

The blistering pace of job creation in Canada comes amid signs that the U.S. employment market may be softening. Economists had expected more than 100,000 new jobs to be created in December, and the news sent the beleaguered U.S. dollar into another tailspin. A stalled labour market could spell trouble for the election aspirations of President George W. Bush, who is counting on a robust economy to carry him to a second term in November. But, while economists here marvelled over the strength of the Canadian job market yesterday, the Bank of Canada was injecting a note of caution into the outlook.

David Longworth, deputy governor of the Bank of Canada, said in a speech in Toronto that growth in the last three months of 2003 wasn't as strong as the bank had thought.

"Data received up to the end of December suggest that growth may be somewhat lower than we expected, at close to 4 per cent [at an annual rate].'' Despite the strong jobs report, the deputy's comments and the surging dollar have the market still expecting that the central bank will cut rates at the scheduled Jan. 20 interest rate announcement.

But the mixed signals have many observers hedging their bets.

"Over all, the probability of a cut does fall with these [job] numbers," said Royal Bank of Canada economist David Wolf, "but only marginally, not nearly from a 'definitely yes' to a 'definitely no'. The call is still a close one."

The strength of the December labour market surprised analysts. Most of the 53,000 new jobs were full-time positions and the unemployment rate edged down to 7.4 per cent from 7.5 per cent in November, Statistics Canada said.

In the final four months of 2003 alone, the economy pumped out 219,000 new jobs in all. That was more than quadruple the 52,000 that appeared in the first eight months of the year.

While celebrating the gains, many analysts were quick to note another decline in manufacturing employment, where employers have been shedding workers as the stronger dollar cuts into their ability to remain competitive in export markets like the United States.

Since November, 2002, 82,000 factory jobs disappeared as the Canadian dollar climbed by about 22 per cent. Almost all the job losses were in Ontario and Quebec, Statscan said, with most of the downsizing concentrated among manufacturers of computer and electronic products, electrical equipment and appliances.

The fact that factories are bucking the national trend by cutting employment while others hire is a reason for the Bank of Canada to cut interest rates, said CIBC World Markets Inc. economist Avery Shenfeld. "Factory job shedding will spill over into services and consumer demand down the road."

For all of 2003, the 1.7-per-cent rise in total employment fell far short of the stunning 2002 gain of 3.7 per cent, mainly because of the job losses in manufacturing, Statscan said. While the pace of job creation slowed, the mix of new jobs was better. Of the 271,000 new jobs in all of 2003, 90 per cent were full-time, a big improvement on the 62-per-cent share for full-time spots in 2002. One reason might be that public sector hiring was more important to the job market in 2003 -- when it accounted for 39 per cent of all new jobs -- than it was in 2002, when its share of job creation was only 21 per cent.

Bank of Nova Scotia economist Adrienne Warren said total job gains "are bound to slow in 2004. Manufacturers continue to face strong pressures to reduce costs, while federal and provincial government restraint suggests that the public sector will be much less supportive."

While Canada's job machine kept cranking out new positions, however, the U.S. labour market ground to a halt after previously showing signs of revival.

David Rosenberg, Merrill Lynch Inc.'s chief North American economist, noting that Canada created more jobs in the past three months than the United States, despite being a 10th its size, cracked: "Is Canada the new China?"

Despite the economy's respectable jobs gains in the face of a rising dollar and setbacks such as SARS and mad-cow disease, young people -- defined as those under 25 -- had a tough time finding jobs last year. Statscan noted that the number of youths with jobs increased by only 0.6 per cent in 2003, compared with 4.6 per cent in 2002.

NORTH V. SOUTH

Percentage change in total employment in Canada and the United States since Dec., 2000

CANADA

2002: Near record year of job gains

Jan. - Aug., 2003: Economy stalled by SARS, mad-cow disease and the rising dollar

Sept. - Dec., 2003: Biggest four-month increase in 20 years

UNITED STATES

First quarter, 2001: U.S. recession begins

Nov., 2001: GDP begins to recover but job losses continue

July, 2003 onwards: Growth in GDP takes off but still no job creation

SOURCE: THOMSON DATASTREAM; STATISTICS CANADA




-- ECONOMICS REPORTER


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: fizzle; jobgrowth; joblessgrowth; revival
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Sigh. This is embarassing. Some Cato-cretin will undoubtedly explain that this is also a good sign...
1 posted on 03/10/2004 2:38:07 PM PST by Paul Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Are you sure you don't want to put this 10 January article in "Breaking News"?
2 posted on 03/10/2004 2:39:59 PM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
If this is good news, why are the Liberals tanking in the polls? Paul Martin should dissolve Parliament and call a snap election to test the theory an economy roaring on all cylinders is a party's biggest asset in an election.
3 posted on 03/10/2004 2:40:29 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
I'd love to know who cooked up these numbers. The Asians were critical of a "meager" 21,000 new jobs last month. SOURCE.

However bad it may be, it certainly isn't that bad.

4 posted on 03/10/2004 2:44:31 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Do you expect us to believe this? Try again.
5 posted on 03/10/2004 2:46:55 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
The article does a great job of not saying in what area (manufacturing? service? government?) the jobs are being created, except for the tossaway line "One reason might be that public sector hiring was more important to the job market in 2003...".

If the jobs explosion is in government, then it's just more of la grande illusion.

6 posted on 03/10/2004 2:49:05 PM PST by Middle Man (If taxes aren't eating you, then taxes are feeding you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Canada's job growth soars past U.S.

Soars past? Don't hold your breath.

7 posted on 03/10/2004 2:55:22 PM PST by demlosers (Ann Coulter: Liberals simply can't grasp the problem Lexis-Nexis poses to their incessant lying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Anothe great example of unbiased reporting - he gloats as he compares the job creation numbers, but when he quotes the canadian unemployment numbers of 7.4%, he conveniently neglects to point out the fact that it is almost 2 points lower in the US - 5.6%!!!
8 posted on 03/10/2004 3:01:50 PM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Eva
Eva, these figures are not implausible from what I'm seeing. We're not hearing about big job losses. Our auto plants are running well, with many of the top North American cars coming from Canuck factories, particularly in Ontario. Alberta is continuing strong. Retail sales, while not setting the world on fire, are holding well. I'm in the consumer electornics industry and sales of expensive LCD and plasma TV's are outpacing supply. There are some regional blips like my hometown (Chatham, Ontario) but the unemployment numbers generated are local and small in the greater scheme of things. Resource buisiness is good, and many are employed there. The numbers do seem a little high, but recall that we didn't surge as much as the U.S. did so the fallback is going to be less pronounced.

We have a low dollar which is certainly helping, but our trade surplus with The States dropped a bit in the past quater, but it's still at historically normal levels. We're getting some outsourcing business. Housing starts, especially in the Greater Toronto Region, are at record highs and have been for the past 2 years which drives so much other activity. We have a major shortage of construction employees, mainly in Ontario and again, Alberta.

How long this will last is of course anyones's guess. But at the present time things are good.

Short of wierd anomolies, we mirror U.S. economic performance pretty closely. No kidding, if Canada is seeing these numbers it's a good sign for the U.S. as we tend to behave in close correlation.

Hopefully we'll see results below the 49th parallel that will help President Bush in November. I'm confident this will be the case.

Cheers, eh!

10 posted on 03/10/2004 3:04:48 PM PST by mitchbert (Facts are Stubborn Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Lots of new gov't jobs. The US could do this, too, but the US is also giving lip-service to remaining non-socialist.
11 posted on 03/10/2004 3:05:37 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mitchbert
I don't know where you live, but that's not what I am seeing in WA State, where we are supposed to have the second highest unemployment rate in the country. The economy is booming, the malls are full and new houses are going up all over the place.

This is in a county where the environmentalists have killed off the top two employers in the county as well as decimated the fishing industry and logging. Somehow people are still finding jobs and spending money like crazy.
12 posted on 03/10/2004 3:08:39 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Digger
It's good news. All the wetbacks will be on the move to Canada. Let'um hit the emergency rooms & check back in 3-5 yrs when the Canadian medical hospitals have all closed shop.

Let's dispense with the racial slurs. I am sure we have many Hispanic of Mexican descent on this board. That includes my wife and children.

13 posted on 03/10/2004 3:08:41 PM PST by Timmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mitchbert; Paul Ross
Additionally, and to your point Paul, Canada has historically had unemployment rates 2 to 3 points higher than the U.S. even in good times. Probably has to do with our higher level of social(ist) programs. Not a good thing in my view, but it's the reality on the ground. Our welfare state does unfortunately produce a situation where for many it makes more sense to stay on the dole than to work, particularly if you're a single mother or young, unemployed male. We need to fix this but our present government will most surely not do it. Maybe a new Conservative regime will but I'm not holding my breath at this time.

Cheers!

14 posted on 03/10/2004 3:09:52 PM PST by mitchbert (Facts are Stubborn Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
What this means is Canada's unit labour costs are rising like crazy. They have next to no productivity growth in Canada. It will be nice in the short term but no the long term
15 posted on 03/10/2004 3:11:42 PM PST by raloxk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
God forbid that some other country add to its employment. Must be our fault.
16 posted on 03/10/2004 3:13:38 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva
I'm in Toronto, and BC seems to be doing OK as well, although they traditionally have a much more left tack than most of the country, certainly the rest of the West.

I feel good about both our economies over the next couple of fiscal years. Unfortunately, employment increases, especially in this era of greater efficiencies driven by Enterprise Wide Systems in larger businesses, is not tracking up as quickly in this recovery as we would expect from past expereiences, is skewing the expectations of many. Still, I'm confident looking at the next two or three years. Hope it happens before Novemeber down there. A Kerry presidency would hurt both of our countries.

17 posted on 03/10/2004 3:16:24 PM PST by mitchbert (Facts are Stubborn Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mitchbert
A Kerry presidency is just not going to happen. The US unemployment rate is lower than it has been in the past 20 years. Don't believe the phoney numbers that you read in the press. Trust the Wall Street Journal, the economy is booming ahead.
18 posted on 03/10/2004 3:36:29 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
This author is disingenuous at best, deliberately deceptive at worst. The December non-gain was an anomoly. It was also later revised up to 16,000. Want to compare economic growth Canada? Bring it on.
19 posted on 03/10/2004 3:40:53 PM PST by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eva
Agreed and yes, I've been watching the numbers. Hopefully the Dem lies won't have any traction. I've always had the greatest confidence that the vast majority of American voters can see through the liberal media fog, 1992 and 1996 aside. Bush is strong and IMO will only gain strength between now and the election. American's aren't blind...they'll see through this empty suit. Kerry is no Clinton, and thank goodness for that. You don't need a repeat of that mess.

Cheers!

20 posted on 03/10/2004 3:42:09 PM PST by mitchbert (Facts are Stubborn Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson