1 posted on
03/09/2004 4:26:37 PM PST by
blam
To: farmfriend
The interior of Agia Sophia's dome. Still Istanbul's landmark, the majestic Byzantine church with all its precious treasures must have awed the crusaders
2 posted on
03/09/2004 4:28:45 PM PST by
blam
To: blam
The crusades are literally, a 1400 year long war going on to this day.
3 posted on
03/09/2004 4:29:55 PM PST by
Monty22
To: blam
Mark for later read.
5 posted on
03/09/2004 4:32:20 PM PST by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: blam
I just really enjoy your posts, Blam. Always interesting things you find to share here.
6 posted on
03/09/2004 4:33:16 PM PST by
jla
To: blam
B4L8r
7 posted on
03/09/2004 4:37:57 PM PST by
AFreeBird
(your mileage may vary)
To: blam
Keep a lookout for Cecil B. DeMille's 1935 film on TCM, I have it on tape, one of my faves..
"Summary: DeMille At His Peak!
THE CRUSADES is a film of awesome power with some of the finest costumes, epic battles and all the pagentry expected of the legendary Cecil B. DeMille. Henry Wilcoxon's Richard the Lionheart gives (along with his star turn as Marc Anthony in DeMille's CLEOPATRA the previous year) the greatest performance of his entire career. Mesmerizing in its power, just as effective today as when it was filmed in 1935. A must-see for all who esteem the epic/spectacle genre. Fine performances given by an all-star cast right down to DeMille regulars in supporting roles. They don't get much better than this! (imdb user review)"
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0026249/
13 posted on
03/09/2004 5:43:25 PM PST by
wolficatZ
(___><))))*>____)
To: blam
The immense losses sustained during these outbreaks of anti-western feeling resulted in Venetian claims for compensation were still unsettled in 1203.
Sadly, if Manuel I and Andronikos I had not driven out the Venetians and Alexios IV had paid the money he promised, this horrible atrocity may never have happened. As it was, the Byzantines became known as perfidous and thus unworthy of the sacrifices the crusaders were expected to endure on their behalf.
And really, the Latins made up for this sin later against the Turks. If it wasn't for Latin assistance during the 14th & 15th century, Constantinople would have been taken much sooner than AD 1453.
14 posted on
03/09/2004 6:05:02 PM PST by
Antoninus
(Federal Marriage Amendment NOW!)
To: blam
Good post!
To: blam; *Gods, Graves, Glyphs; A.J.Armitage; abner; adam_az; AdmSmith; Alas Babylon!; ...
Gods, Graves, Glyphs List for articles regarding early civilizations , life of all forms, - dinosaurs - etc.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this ping list.
20 posted on
03/09/2004 11:06:14 PM PST by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: blam; All
23 posted on
03/10/2004 5:00:50 AM PST by
Fedora
To: blam
Better the Turkish turban than the pope's tiara. In terms of political domination, the Byzantines preferred to maintain their own theology under Ottoman rule than to suffer union with the church of Rome and western rule. Yeah, but who got the booty, hmm?
26 posted on
05/04/2004 1:46:29 PM PDT by
skeeter
To: blam
Bookmarking for tonight.
27 posted on
05/04/2004 1:50:55 PM PDT by
BunnySlippers
(Must get Moose and Squirrel ... B. Badanov.)
To: blam
Istanbul was Constantinople.
Now its Istanbul, not Constantinople.
So, if you have a date in Constantinople,
Shell be waiting in Istanbul.
28 posted on
05/04/2004 2:02:42 PM PDT by
tnlibertarian
(Even old New York, was once New Amsterdam.)
To: blam
29 posted on
11/06/2006 7:01:11 PM PST by
OldCorps
To: blam
To: blam
I’ve often wondered what the life of a Templar Knight in the late tenth century would be like. The earliest known example of my surname outside the Domesday Book is found in the Templar Inquisition of 1185. He was in Essex.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson