Same thing we've been reading for a couple of days, just a new article with some new insight into what these outraged survivers are connected to. The story is picking up traction. I hope people see how she is trying to get around the new campaign finance restrictions through backdoor influence. Not to mention, exploiting these surviviors of 9/11 for her husbands political gain.
miserable failure miserable failure miserable failure miserable failure war criminal
1 posted on
03/09/2004 7:05:53 AM PST by
Fun Bob
To: Fun Bob
Fabulous,,at last,,the press is picking it up. If this gets feet, Kerry is toast.
2 posted on
03/09/2004 7:08:19 AM PST by
cajungirl
(John Kerry has no botox and I have a bridge to sell you!)
To: Fun Bob
Nasty John the Waffling French Undertaker, who is behind the atatacks on GWB's 9/11 ad, per NewsMax & the American Spectator & now the NY Post.
Kerry, who is personally endorsed by Yasser Arafat, Haiti's Aristide, Iran's Mullahs, Traitor "Red Jane" Fonda, Kim Jong Il, (& Kim Il Jong), Mugabe, Marxist thug Chavez of Venezuela, Castro of Cuba, & France's Jacques Chirac, is a weapon of mass economic destruction.
He'll destroy the troops in Iraq, the War on Terrorism,
& the U.S. stock market with all his negative talk and whiny-leftist-liberal sour-puss troop-bashing, Bush-bashing, America-bashing talk & self-aggrandizing, ultra-negative sourpuss whiny elitist personality.
To: Fun Bob
Big Bump!
5 posted on
03/09/2004 7:11:04 AM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Fun Bob
7 posted on
03/09/2004 7:11:47 AM PST by
Cboldt
To: Fun Bob
I'm glad you posted this but you should have identified it as an editorial since it lends more veracity to it. Until I went to the Post website I wasn't sure if this was an editorial or just a letter to the editor. In any event, I would like to see more stories on this scandal. This whole "outrage" bit was STAGED by the Democrats and the media just swallowed it whole. They didn't investigate the background of the group they belong to. Or maybe the media knew but wanted to hide the fact.
8 posted on
03/09/2004 7:13:03 AM PST by
PJ-Comix
(Saddam Hussein was only 537 Florida votes away from still being in power)
To: doug from upland; dead
PING, your hard work is catching on!!!!
10 posted on
03/09/2004 7:14:56 AM PST by
codercpc
To: Fun Bob
Have you emailed this to Fox or Rush or Hannity??? It wouldn't do any good to send it anywhere else, although in Chris Matthews favor he did ask some hard questions of one of those 9-11 family members that was mad...he might bring it up again.
To: Fun Bob
Just saw a Washington Post guy on MSNBC to explain their latest poll showing Kerry beating Bush even with Nader factored in. He said that without Nader Kerry was ahead by 9. Then he asserted that the Bush campaign "stumbled" last week with their ads by including 9/11 footage, causing "even Republicans" to question if the Bush campaign would spend their money wisely.
Gack
To: Fun Bob
Same thing, but in a major paper for the first time.
17 posted on
03/09/2004 7:28:01 AM PST by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
To: Fun Bob
You mean "widespread media outrage". The population isn't buying this leftist crap.
18 posted on
03/09/2004 7:28:18 AM PST by
sarasota
To: Fun Bob
I'm really glad to see this in a major newspaper. Now, if only the NY Times, for instance, would report this...
**not really holding my breath though.
22 posted on
03/09/2004 7:46:58 AM PST by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
To: Fun Bob
Go NY Post!
29 posted on
03/09/2004 12:04:27 PM PST by
jmstein7
(Real Men Don't Need Chunks of Government Metal on Their Chests to be Heroes)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson