Skip to comments.
Women forced to have abortions?
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Tuesday, March 9, 2004
Posted on 03/08/2004 11:03:09 PM PST by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
To: Canticle_of_Deborah
This is a very, very dangerous court ruling.>>
It sure is, I remember when I was on the first aid squad, we were not allowed to take anyone who didn't want to go to the hospital for treatment. This decision is more proof for the argument that today's judges are activist judges who want to push their atheistic, Marxist agenda.
41
posted on
03/09/2004 9:19:47 PM PST
by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
Comment #42 Removed by Moderator
To: Mr. Silverback
bump and thanks!
43
posted on
03/09/2004 11:50:14 PM PST
by
lainde
(Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
To: JohnHuang2
Ugh. Reminds me of Nazi concentration camps. Guess the abortionists have been reading up on some WWII literature. God help us.
tSG
44
posted on
03/10/2004 8:38:12 AM PST
by
alkaloid2
(Hey! Check out http://www.thesupergenius.com!)
To: JohnHuang2
She ran back to the clinic entrance where her boyfriend stopped her. The boyfriend said she must get an abortion, "I've already paid for it." Legal abortion is the best thing that ever happened to irresponsible men. Yet the libs would have you believe it's all about women's rights. What an ironic crock.
To: Siobhan
Unbelievably horrible!
From 1973-1998 over 38 million Americans were aborted. The survivors of Roe v. Wade, young people born since 1973, have lost a third of their generation.
To: jwalsh07
Thanks for the link.
AWARE must be some kind of independent operator. I've never known a Planned Parenthood affiliated clinic to let their slip show, as it were. Very tight with the protective orders.
47
posted on
03/10/2004 1:01:39 PM PST
by
Askel5
To: jwalsh07
I guess -- being that it was her third abortion -- she indeed was positioned to know whether the pain was SOP or not.
48
posted on
03/10/2004 1:03:16 PM PST
by
Askel5
To: JohnHuang2
Where are the advocates for choice on this? I know they're "deeply troubled". /sarcasm
To: CalKat
Choice, my tuchis!
50
posted on
03/10/2004 1:17:09 PM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
(Pre-empt the third murder attempt-- Pray for Terry Schiavo!)
To: Siobhan
When you think you've heard the worst...along comes something only the evil one would consider...... God have mercy on us all.
51
posted on
03/11/2004 1:01:01 PM PST
by
ejo
To: Coleus
acknowledging that a woman's right to say "no" to an abortion, at any point in time, is absolute, and that this right is found in the FACE Act. I would say that this right is much more fundamental than just the FACE Act.
To: JohnHuang2
Interesting. At the same time there's a case with a woman that had one twin die at birth (they found the child already full of crack) and the same pro-choice people are whining about her being charged with murder.
Can't they make up their minds?
53
posted on
03/16/2004 10:47:29 PM PST
by
Fledermaus
(Ðíé F£éðérmáú§ ^;;^ says, "Tick off France, Germany, Spain and Al Qaeda - VOTE BUSH!)
To: JohnHuang2
Omg.. how disgusting and evil!
54
posted on
03/16/2004 10:49:23 PM PST
by
Trillian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson