[familyop]

"...once home and private schools become part of government-financed facilities or programs, they can no longer remain “private,”..."

This is not true. It's dishonest propaganda. Does the government force poor parents to spend their "earned income credits" (or whatever those are called this year) in any particular way? Of course not. Poor parents can discriminate in whatever way they wish with that money. How vouchers are spent depends on whether or not we allow left/liberal teachers to get laws through Congress to that effect.

Folks, Susan B. Anthony and her friends pushed for public education to control each next generation, and their kind eventually had legislation passed for pub. ed. by handing anecdotes of poor children in testimony to Congress.

We must honestly defame the use of sorrowful anecdotes to Congress and inhibit Congress from listening to anything but hard facts from objective research.

In general, children are safer being reared in their own families than by government influence/"protection." And there's no in-between, because the fight over the hearts and minds of the next generation is always on.

[silly me]

This person can't read. The federal government has DEFINED schools as "day care facilities": Any place that houses students for [the better part of the day] or 8 hours a day. They have publicly made a list of "things we can control" and "daycare facilities" was one of them.

Susan B. Anthony did her part, but public education started with the Unitarian Universalists in BAAAHSTON, MASS.
It was their contention that parents didn't have what it took to educate their children. Elitists!!!

Do some more research honey. Better yet: Get Charlotte Iserbyt's book, Deliberate Dumbing Down of America and get a real education.