Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bluntpoint
Very nice. For district courts.

I am under the impression from the lawyers who have discussed this on tv that it does NOT apply to federal cases such as this one.

Not one of them has mentioned a problem with the jury being reasons for appeal; in fact, most of them have outright stated that that is not the case in federal trials.

We shall see who is correct; if I am wrong, I'll be back to admit it, as I am sure you will be.
313 posted on 03/10/2004 10:52:30 AM PST by Howlin (Charter Member of the Incredible Interlocking Institutional Power!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin
No, in this case, as I said in my original post, there probably is not grounds for appeal.

My post went to your sweeping and mistaken impression of what is and is not appealable.

And you were wrong.

But I only went to law school and practiced trial law for near 20 years.

I taught a number of CLE classes on appellate civil procedure.

I don't have your tv watching experience.

Maybe you can watch ER and diagnose my heart ailment.

317 posted on 03/10/2004 10:57:55 AM PST by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson