To: Howlin
No, in this case, as I said in my original post, there probably is not grounds for appeal.
My post went to your sweeping and mistaken impression of what is and is not appealable.
And you were wrong.
But I only went to law school and practiced trial law for near 20 years.
I taught a number of CLE classes on appellate civil procedure.
I don't have your tv watching experience.
Maybe you can watch ER and diagnose my heart ailment.
To: Bluntpoint
But I only went to law school and practiced trial law for near 20 years. I taught a number of CLE classes on appellate civil procedure.
I don't have your tv watching experience.
Maybe you can watch ER and diagnose my heart ailment.
ROTFLMAO!
320 posted on
03/10/2004 11:03:05 AM PST by
Don Joe
(We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
To: Bluntpoint
And you were wrong. Then why aren't any of the lawyers speaking in that whole list of articles I linked even HINTING at that as part of the appeal?
322 posted on
03/10/2004 11:04:08 AM PST by
Howlin
(Charter Member of the Incredible Interlocking Institutional Power!!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson