I was somewhat surprised at this editorial, supporting the jury's finding.
In retrospect, I realize how little of an impression this trial made on me until the jury's verdict, in large part because it seemed to me most of the media had decided the government was wrong and didn't bother to try and see the case the way the jury was seeing it: a substantial 6 weeks of testimony against Martha, verses a paltry 20 minute defense by Martha's lawyer (who was paid a hefty $9 million by Martha).
1 posted on
03/06/2004 11:25:49 AM PST by
summer
To: summer
I bet Martha gave her lawyers an ear-full after the verdict yesterday.
2 posted on
03/06/2004 11:28:39 AM PST by
devane617
To: summer
Gee, I wonder if the NYT would support throwing bureaucrats and politicians in jail for lying.
4 posted on
03/06/2004 11:34:10 AM PST by
sergeantdave
(Gen. Custer wore an Arrowsmith shirt to his last property owner convention.)
To: summer
Martha Stewart is likely to go to jail for lying. Too bad the same thing didn't happen to the Great Stainmaker, or his Charming Bride (a.k.a. The Commodities Scam Queen).
ML/NJ
10 posted on
03/06/2004 11:45:29 AM PST by
ml/nj
To: summer
I was somewhat surprised at this editorial, supporting the jury's finding. I'm not all that surprised. The anti-capitalist class warriors at the Times agree with the anti-capitalist class warriors at FR. Of course the surprising part is that the Times would turn on one of their own. Why didn't they do that with Clinton?
To: summer
Her biggest mistake was to talk to a government agent except through her lawyers.
Rule number one is don't say anything.
25 posted on
03/06/2004 12:44:18 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: summer
I want to know just who she pissed off so much, that she was actually tried on these charges. Too many people have walked or been slapped on the wrists for much more serious charges.
41 posted on
03/06/2004 1:39:50 PM PST by
TheSpottedOwl
(Until Kofi Annan rides the Jerusalem RTD....nothing will change.)
To: summer
Martha's lawyer bills her company, not Martha personally. It's all in the fine print of the original contract when she started the firm. So in effect, her stockholders are paying her bills, plus losing their shirts.
51 posted on
03/06/2004 2:08:31 PM PST by
hershey
To: summer
I heard Greta Van Suffering had a meltdown over this...I suppose her buddy Larry Kudlow did too....
To: summer
I wasn't sure what to think about Martha, but now that the NYT has weighed in . . . Free Martha!
Seriously, with Stewart being such a big Democratic donor, I'm surprised they don't want her released.
To: summer
It looks like the liberals of the world have regained their abhorrence for lying, lost since their halcyon days of whine and Clinton.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson