Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq Threat Deliberately Inflated, Kennedy Says
NY Times ^ | 3-5-04 | DOUGLAS JEHL

Posted on 03/05/2004 3:42:57 PM PST by Indy Pendance

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

A Brief Compilation of DemocRAT Hypocrisy

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998.

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do." Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002.

"[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.

1 posted on 03/05/2004 3:42:57 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
It's time for the Bush administration to use this stuff.

It's clear that they will scrape the bottom of the barrel in their attacks, given the shameful talking-points presentations given by 9/11 widows (like the Breitwiser chick) that were certainly orchestrated by the DNC.

2 posted on 03/05/2004 3:49:07 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Teddy, if you want to see "deliberately inflated," look in a mirror...


3 posted on 03/05/2004 3:54:41 PM PST by inkling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

Iraq A Threat Says Deliberately Inflated Kennedy

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.
4 posted on 03/05/2004 3:56:11 PM PST by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
This is the ultimate question that the American people should ask themselves: Does America want a President who will take swift and decisive action against terrorists, and make them pay a heavy price for each act of terror, or does America want another President who will stick his head in the sand and do nothing?
5 posted on 03/05/2004 3:59:49 PM PST by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destructor
What is the use of having the world's most powerful military... if you never use it?
6 posted on 03/05/2004 4:01:25 PM PST by dvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: inkling
doesn't he have liver cancer?
7 posted on 03/05/2004 4:01:30 PM PST by petercooper (Florida 2000: Bush 2,912,790 - Gore 2,912,253)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
"Iraq Threat Deliberately Inflated, Kennedy Says"

Just like the size of your clothing Ted!
8 posted on 03/05/2004 4:01:44 PM PST by Arpege92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Why is it that every brain fart that any democrat makes is automatically news?
9 posted on 03/05/2004 4:03:26 PM PST by Sofa King (MY rights are not subject to YOUR approval http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; dennisw; okie01; Kenny Bunk
"pure, unadulterated fear-mongering, based on a devious strategy to convince the American people that Saddam's ability to provide nuclear weapons to Al Qaeda justified immediate war."

Big Lie technique, a bit overwrought here.

1. "Immediate" or "Imminent" war is a fabrication, but a standard one. Bush did not say this. The lack of an "immediate" threat was the OPEC/France/Demo talking point for maintaining "containment" aka UN sanctions and the Oil for Food scheme.

2. "Nuclear weapons" Nuclear was Bush's lest pressed point. But if Kennedy said "biological" or "chemical" that would not be as effective since many people think Iraq must have had some of it, even if never found.

Should be an interesting election...
10 posted on 03/05/2004 4:03:59 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
What's inflated are Kennedy's ass, liver and ego.
11 posted on 03/05/2004 4:04:26 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King
exactly. This speech was a big FAT nothing, unless you worship the god of leftism, as they do at the NYT.
12 posted on 03/05/2004 4:05:12 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: inkling
Inflated is too flattering a term. I think alcoholism bloated would be more apt.

13 posted on 03/05/2004 4:10:51 PM PST by Gringo1 (All contents of this post may be contrived,made-up,or just plain not true at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: inkling
And his best buddies problem.
14 posted on 03/05/2004 4:15:20 PM PST by Gringo1 (All contents of this post may be contrived,made-up,or just plain not true at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Yaaawwwwwnnnnnnn... wonder what's for supper?
15 posted on 03/05/2004 4:15:28 PM PST by CommandoFrank (If GW is the terrorist's worst nightmare, Kerry is their wet dream...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
What do you expect from someone who committed manslaughter.
7/18/69 on Chappaquiddick. Ted Kennedy is a disgrace.
16 posted on 03/05/2004 4:19:43 PM PST by SoCalPol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts today delivered a blistering indictment of President Bush's decision to go to war in Iraq,

Subjective, emotive language bolded as a public service.

How about a blustering indictment?

Suddenly the abortion facilitator is concerned about "lives lost".

17 posted on 03/05/2004 4:19:49 PM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I think W's daddy should bring Ted back to Texas and give him ANOTHER award.

The thing that pisses me off is Teddy won't go on a talk show where someone can question him about his comments when Clinton was president.
18 posted on 03/05/2004 4:21:30 PM PST by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Yet another Democrat murderer checks in.
19 posted on 03/05/2004 4:22:51 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Someone needs to point out that Clinton appointed Tenet and Teddy voted to confirm him. Which makes me wonder why W hasn't fired him.
20 posted on 03/05/2004 4:23:20 PM PST by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson