Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale
The actual size of the antenna isn't such a major factor so long as the antenna can pick up signal.

I sense a total lack of appreciation for this 'field'; received signal strength (and transmit ERP) for *any* system is directly proportional to antenna gain - a factor which is directly controlled by 'capture area' which relates to an antenna's size ... the ONLY way to make up for a signal which has 'sunk' below the noise floor (intrinsic noise in the first active element e.g. as a front end preamplifier) is to increase antenna gain via an increase in it's size there by affecting the S/N (Signal to Noise) ratio ... even so-called Pulse Compression 'chirped' systems which can function with a N'S ratio require a workable N/S ratio prior to 'pulse compression' (in the receiver) and the resultant S/N improvement!

There is no cheating nature and the 'fact' of thermally induced/created 'noise' in all active devices (and even passive devices!) as used in any RF/RADAR/Radio system!

43 posted on 03/05/2004 6:07:54 PM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


...Blimps are useless against very large terrorists.
44 posted on 03/05/2004 6:14:09 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson