Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: _Jim
Good, then 1 satellite could do the job of 1000 balloons.
33 posted on 03/05/2004 5:09:50 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale
Good, then 1 satellite could do the job of 1000 balloons.

You don't see one good physics-based reasons why this might be undoable?

I do. In fact, I see several ... one has to do with the inverse square law as it relates to the expansion of a propagating 'radio' (EM) wave ...

34 posted on 03/05/2004 5:12:19 PM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale; Paleo Conservative
Good, then 1 satellite could do the job of 1000 balloons.

1 satellite in geosynchronous orbit can't do the reconnaissance job of even one balloon, because of its distance from Earth. Trying to, say, photograph Earth from geosynchronous orbit is not likely to be terribly successful.

I think I saw something about that on the History Channel. But once the external fabric caught on fire, it was inevitable that the hydrogen gas bags would also ignite.

True, though hydrogen rises so quickly that the flames shoot up and away. Looks spectacular, but much less dangerous to people on the ground, and it's over quickly. The Hindenburg's hydrogen did catch on fire, but what you see in the film is its fabric burning.

35 posted on 03/05/2004 5:15:00 PM PST by SedVictaCatoni (Your ears you keep and I'll tell you why.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson