To: Fishface
Because he says so.
7 posted on
03/04/2004 9:59:43 AM PST by
Howlin
(Just another unrepentant Bush supporter.)
To: Howlin
Novak has been universally negative toward Bush, at least for the last two years.
The only scoop he got from the Bush administration was the Plame revelation, and it got him singed.
20 posted on
03/04/2004 10:05:38 AM PST by
sinkspur
(Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
To: Howlin
Novak is more conservative than liberal -- by a long shot. He was burned over the war issue. There was a lot of bridge burning going on, especially by the so-called neo-cons. Burnt bridges have a way of coming back to haunt you. Hopefully this painful lesson will be learned and not repeated by our side. I like to see such cannibalism on the left, not the right.
22 posted on
03/04/2004 10:05:47 AM PST by
King Black Robe
(With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
To: Howlin
This would explain why CNN considers him one of their chief conservative commentators. Novak is probably lying (not about being a Dem) and possibly at the urging of his cohorts at CNN. His assertion that some in the GOP think they can maintain control of Congress without Bush is idiotic. The GOP majority in the Senate is narrow and let's not fool ourselves, Bush had a great deal to do with the GOP being able to bolster it's majority in the House and reclaim the Senate in 2002.
63 posted on
03/04/2004 10:22:07 AM PST by
miloklancy
(The biggest problem with the Democrats is that they are in office.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson