LOST is indeed alive and well.
We need to find bill numbers and start a letter campaign ASAP.
To: RickofEssex; bulldogs; Vigilanteman; ServesURight; NonValueAdded; knighthawk; DakotaGator; ...
LOST PING
To: hedgetrimmer
It doesn't matter who we put in office. They are all UN loving, globalist, socialist scumbags.
3 posted on
03/04/2004 8:12:47 AM PST by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
To: hedgetrimmer; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
5 posted on
03/04/2004 8:18:44 AM PST by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: hedgetrimmer
INTREP - LOST
To: hedgetrimmer; .30Carbine; *Sovereignty_list; *UN_List; *gov_watch; *Conspiracy
10 posted on
03/04/2004 9:29:07 AM PST by
TigersEye
(Carrying a gun is a social obligation.)
To: hedgetrimmer
This is important, mainly because it is related to the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty. While the sea, the continental shelf, the deep sea are interesting because of oil/gas, outer space is interesting because of unlimited potential. Outer space law is developing along the same lines as the law of the sea, mainly because the thoughts and ideas of our governors are limited to a handful of pragmatic possibilities. When it comes to deep sea development and outer space development, a monarchy with a strong navy is the way to go. The touchy-feely modern constitutional republics around the world will never achieve a pace of astounding development and insane profit from either the sea or outer space.
14 posted on
03/04/2004 9:40:51 AM PST by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
To: hedgetrimmer
I'm sorry, but this seems a little kooky. Jane says all of these people and organizations (the US Navy?!) secretly support this goofy treaty, but she provides no evidince.
Take a gander at this particular little jem. It confirms, IMHO, that this article is a bunch of silly hyperventilating:
"It has recently come to light that some members of the Bush administration have been working behind the scenes with a group of international businessmen who want to resurrect this many-tentacled ocean monster. It likely has something to do with the black gold hidden under the sea
It now appears that its ratification is being pushed by Vice President Dick Cheney, the man who ran Halliburton before being pressed back into public service by President Bush."
It APPEARS that international businessmen conspiring against "us" and Cheney SEEMS to be selling his soul for oil. Where have we heard this before? Pu-leeze!
Moreover, does the fact that Judicial Watch and the Sierra Club sued the VP for info that may or may not exist really mean anything? Since when have they ever known their elbows from their, uh, ears?
I could be wrong, but this is seriously setting of my baloney meter.
To: hedgetrimmer; TigersEye; Carry_Okie
I
found this on Thomas.
Treaty Doc. 103-39
October 7, 1994 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, With Annexes, Done at Montego Bay, December 10, 1982 (the "Convention"), and the Agreement Relating to the Implementation of Part XI of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982, with Annex, Adopted at New York, July 28, 1994 (the "Agreement"), and signed by the United States, Subject to Ratification, on July 29, 1994. August 11, 1994 -- Public hearing. (S. Hrg. 103-737.) October 14 and 21, 2003 B Public hearings.
16 posted on
03/04/2004 9:45:25 AM PST by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: hedgetrimmer; TigersEye; Carry_Okie
18 posted on
03/04/2004 9:50:45 AM PST by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: hedgetrimmer; farmfriend; Travis McGee; GeronL; Tailgunner Joe
From Henry Lamb's email on the topic:
Among the treatys many flaws, it authorizes the U.N. to impose a tax, and to extract royalties on activities in and on the international seabed. It requires the transfer of technology - including information that may have security implications. For more detailed information about this terrible treaty, see these two great articles by Frank Gaffney, Assistant Secretary of Defense under Ronald Reagan.http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/index.jsp?section=papers&code=04-D_08
http://www.nationalreview.com/gaffney/gaffney200402261356.asp
We must take two actions - NOW!
First, call Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist - 202-224-3344 - and ask him to not allow this treaty to by placed on the unanimous consent calendar.
Next, call your Senator, and ask him/her to file an objection to force a floor debate and vote. Then ask the Senator to vote against the treaty.
23 posted on
03/04/2004 11:00:17 AM PST by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by central planning.)
To: hedgetrimmer
To: hedgetrimmer
Right up until the this glob of horse hockey fell upon Cheney I was in sync. Now I realize that it is nothing but spin from the loonie liberal democrats. It is they who are joined at the hip with the UN, not Cheney or any other Republican.
33 posted on
03/04/2004 2:57:31 PM PST by
F.J. Mitchell
(With only one John left there will now be a lot of democrats standing cross legged.)
To: hedgetrimmer
Thank you so much for all the research you did and posted here.
To: hedgetrimmer
I emailed my senators to see if they would responed with any info on this thing...
42 posted on
03/05/2004 8:40:32 AM PST by
kt56
To: hedgetrimmer
54 posted on
03/05/2004 6:33:36 PM PST by
Mikey
To: hedgetrimmer
Under the LOST, the United Nations would have the power to tax any and every type of sea-going vessel, as well as any type of ocean research and exploration. In fact, it would give the United Nations absolute control of these activities.Taxation is not possible without the threat of force. The mighty U.N. Navy, I take it, will be the enforcement arm?
If they are fool enough to pass it, we can laugh mockingly at them.
59 posted on
03/06/2004 6:54:25 AM PST by
JimRed
(Fight election fraud! Volunteer as a local poll watcher, challenger or district official.)
To: hedgetrimmer
HOLY!.. Convoluted ZigZaging Conspiracy's BATMAN...
66 posted on
03/06/2004 3:27:52 PM PST by
hosepipe
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson