1 posted on
03/04/2004 1:42:14 AM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Good analysis.
2 posted on
03/04/2004 1:46:23 AM PST by
Texasforever
(When democrats attack it is called campaigning)
To: kattracks
He's right about the type of speeches he should give. He really gives outstanding speeches when he wants to.
Contrast that with Kerry's boring, mind-numbing speeches.
No contest.
I just bought the new book he wrote about Bush. Haven't read it yet though.
3 posted on
03/04/2004 1:49:08 AM PST by
texasflower
(in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
To: kattracks; Fledermaus; onyx; FairOpinion
I read Novak, then thank heavens for Podhoretz as an antidote.
4 posted on
03/04/2004 1:49:31 AM PST by
MEG33
(John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
To: kattracks
Good points all.
I read that there is "controversy" over a shot of the Twin Towers in one of the ads - that is because we have recovered so successfully, thanks to Bush, that many Americans have virtually forgotten that it ever happened. We need to be reminded of all that has been done.
And we need to focus on the future, especially since the Dems are going to be busy focusing on an event of 40 years ago.
9 posted on
03/04/2004 2:09:48 AM PST by
livius
To: kattracks
Good read, thanks for posting.
To: kattracks
two words to give your assurance...Karen Hughes. She had as much to do with the 2002 romp as anyone. Take heart. the failure right now is in the world of goood candidates to be elected with President Bush.
15 posted on
03/04/2004 5:01:35 AM PST by
q_an_a
To: kattracks
It just so happens that advertising is a perfect vehicle to remind people about how every single person in the United States who pays taxes has benefited from the tax cuts.This would be fine, except that we are reaching (or may already have reached) the point at which taxpayers are a minority of those eligible to vote.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson