I didn't say any such thing. In fact, all I did was point out that this asinine piece was clearly a pathetic attempt at humor that too many people took at face value.
That's not quite what you said. You said, "It wouldn't have been printed except for the film it is trying to spoof being a target for some. ".
You were specifically saying that "it wouldn't have been printed" were it not for the fact that the film was "a target".
If my reading of that as "this was printed in order to target the film", i.e. attack it, was somehow mistaken, please clarify what you did mean by it. But I fail to see how it could merely mean, "the piece was an attempt at humor that some people mistook for nonfiction."
You should save your "un-holier than thou" speechs for someone else.
Ooookay.