Ahhh, righteous indignation. Amazingly childish rant for someone so above it all. LOL
In case you can't read anything but your cut and paste shaman predictions I'll give you another go at it. Reread my comments for context. Then if you have half a brain you will understand what I was talking about, which BTW, wasn't to you.
I choose to work on things which are just as important but which can be achieved. You are mentally masturbating.
Funny, I thought it was just an analogy. Did it hit a nerve?
In case you can't read anything but your cut and paste shaman predictions
99% of the things I post on these threads are typed in directly in response to someone else. I did, once upon a time, have a cut-and-paste library to refute some of the blantantly false comments repeatedly posted by people such as lewislynn, but since he's stopped making those assertions, I deleted my files.
I choose to work on things which are just as important but which can be achieved.
That was Social Security reform, right? Where's the legislation (draft or submitted) for that? Who are the sponsors or potential co-sponsors? If you think playing with "the third rail of politics" is easier than reforming the income tax system, I have to assume you've made some pretty good progress to say that what you want can be achieved when the NRST, with already over 40 co-sponsors (including some moderate Democrats) is just "mental masturbation", as you so colorfully put it.