Skip to comments.
Kerry wins big on Super Tuesday
Washington Times ^
| 3/03/04
| Stephen Dinan
Posted on 03/02/2004 9:12:53 PM PST by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:13:35 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts won an overwhelming victory in yesterday's 10 Democratic presidential contests, booting Sen. John Edwards from the race and setting up a November showdown with President Bush.
In a sign that the battle already had begun, Mr. Bush called Mr. Kerry last night to congratulate him on his performance.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; kerry; supertuesday
1
posted on
03/02/2004 9:12:54 PM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Is it my imagination or are these primary numbers pitifully low for a supposed "fired up" Democratic base?
2
posted on
03/02/2004 9:47:32 PM PST
by
rewrite
To: kattracks
The spelled "Mr. Freeze Mizer" wrong. There's no 'J' or 'K' in his name.
3
posted on
03/02/2004 9:50:37 PM PST
by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: kattracks
They spelled "Mr. Freeze Mizer" wrong. There's no 'J' or 'K' in his name.
4
posted on
03/02/2004 9:50:48 PM PST
by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: BradyLS
I'm sorry, I have a cold!
5
posted on
03/02/2004 9:51:13 PM PST
by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: rewrite
"Mr. Bush, calling from the White House, told Mr. Kerry that "he looked forward to a spirited race,"
Does anyone else get the impression that the "congratulatory phone call" was a charmingly sinister message to Kerry that W now has him fixed directly in his sites?
To: kattracks
Can I be any more underwhelmed? Wake me up when Bush wins re-election in November..yawn :) GO BUSH/CHENEY 2004!
7
posted on
03/02/2004 10:16:15 PM PST
by
goresalooza
(Is that enbalming fluid leaking from Lurch's tear ducts or is he just glad to see us?)
To: rewrite
...had won the election in a tough field.."
This President has a great sense of humor.
The technique is known as damning with faint praise, and is spot on.
Kerry can win, if the national media continues to toe the party line.
8
posted on
03/02/2004 10:23:20 PM PST
by
petertare
(truth, justice and the American way)
To: rewrite
Re:
Is it my imagination or are these primary numbers pitifully low for a supposed "fired up" Democratic base? Just did the math and the totals in all 10 states is around 7,714,000 voters. New York just had 650,000 voters. All these totals are way down from the 2000 primaries or general election.
Yet, CNN and the Media Left have given John eFing the keys to the kingdom!
Gad, these folks have no ethics nor can they count...
9
posted on
03/02/2004 10:32:57 PM PST
by
sonofatpatcher2
(Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
To: sonofatpatcher2
Thanks for the real numbers. I had a suspicion that these primaries were hyped. How come nobody's talking about the poor turn out for the demo-rat primaries? DUH!
10
posted on
03/02/2004 10:50:28 PM PST
by
ChiMark
To: rewrite
I feel the same way. Overall when you tally up all the primaries, and discount the "crossover" votes which were cast to skew the results one way or the other, the "Democrat" turnout has been absolutely nothing to write home about. You must remember that "all" the media will never bring this up because such talk will just further turn off viewers, readers, etc. If I were John Kerry, looking at the independent vote, I would be worried big time. Kerry will go down bad in November. I learned a long time ago never to make a decision based on hate, anger, revenge and emotion! The Democrats have made their own bed, now let them lie in it!
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson