[tpaine]

Homosexuals should be in prison, not running around in leather collars half nude in parades. Society has a right to determine what is preverse and illegal.

Yep, running about it public in leather collars half nude can be declared perverse & illegal.. Indeed; "Society has a right and a duty to promote it's own health and wellbeing."

But we long ago wrote a Constitution with a Bill of Rights's to a private life, with liberty, and to private property.
- Therefore, -- we can't just throw queers in prison for being weird.

Homosexuality was a crime in most states before activist judges got in on the act, as was abortion.

Such prohibitive type laws frequently violate our BOR's in their enforcement. Thus, judges strike them down on that basis..

For decades now we have endured judicial and federal social engineering to our detriment and harm.

States also indulge in "social engineering", and such 'laws' are equally unconstitutional.

Congress better get off it's rear and begin to impeach or there will be another of a long list of reasons not to vote Republican.

I agree. Impeach the judges & politicians who violate our liberties.. -- And leave our constitutional basics as written.

[MissAmericanPie]

Your kind of poppy cock is the yeast in the loaf that destroys a nation. You seem to be overlooking the writings of many of the authors of the constitution who plainly stated that this form of government has no chance of lasting unless it is administered by a moral people.

Moral people define a healthy society, not perverts and their promoters.

[Congressman Billybob]

You end your latest screed with this: "leave our constitutional basics as written." You have missed the point, and apparently not heard of either the Massachusetts decision or the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the US Constitution.

1. Four judges of the SJC in Mass. rewrote their constitution to require that homosexuals be allowed to marry.

2. The FF&C clause means that married homosexuals will fan out to the other states and file suits demanding that their marriages be recognized there.

Your basic assumption is DEAD WRONG. The Constitution HAS ALREADY BEEN CHANGED, as a result of those two conditions. And only a constitutional amendment can PUT IT BACK as it has been for more than two centuries.

There, is that plain enough so even you can understand it?

John / Billybob

[douglas1]

IF you are against amending the constitution then what is this nation to do with the states that allow gay marriages, and the ones that dont, what are we to do with the military what about social security, the truth is marriage of gays will cause a whole lot of problems.