Alberta's Child wrote:
After doing some research on Richard Perle's career, I've speculated that he was functioning in a capacity as an "unpaid advisor" to the U.S. Defense Department because there was no way in hell he could obtain the security clearances required for an appointed position at the Pentagon. … You can call me whatever the hell you want, but I am certainly not a part of any "lunatic fringe."Unless you have a security clearence yourself there's no way you could have access to any information which would allow you to come to any reasonably informed conclusion.
And you certainly aren't going to get any reliable information from the Internet.
Unless you have a security clearence yourself there's no way you could have access to any information which would allow you to come to any reasonably informed conclusion. But you would?
Are you defending all these morons because you have a rational reason to do so, or are you just defending them because you refuse to believe that U.S. defense policy may have been heavily influenced by agents of a foreign government for the last 30 years?