Skip to comments.
William F. Buckley Jr.: Israel Frenzy - Neocons in the middle
National Review Online ^
| March 02, 2004
| William F. Buckley Jr.
Posted on 03/02/2004 1:54:29 PM PST by NutCrackerBoy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
To: af_vet_1981
We can agree on that much ...
It's great when we all can agree, I've strangely found areas where I can agree with both TQ and V, and now you've found agreement with me.
I'm almost ready for a Kumb-by-yah thread.
61
posted on
03/02/2004 7:10:13 PM PST
by
mr.pink
To: mr.pink
It's great when we all can agree, I've strangely found areas where I can agree with both TQ and V, and now you've found agreement with me. I'm almost ready for a Kumb-by-yah thread.Are you on board with Alberta Child's conspiracy theory ?
To: af_vet_1981
I don't know what you mean by "conspiracy theory," but the only person that is really the target of my ire is Richard Perle.
63
posted on
03/02/2004 7:16:56 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
To: af_vet_1981
Are you on board with Alberta Child's conspiracy theory ?
I haven't read it yet, but it seems to have gotten harsh reviews. But as we've all learned lately, harsh reviews don't necessarily equate to box office failure.
Which specific post are you referring to? let me know and I'll try to read it at somepoint soon and then comment.
Much thanks.
64
posted on
03/02/2004 7:18:14 PM PST
by
mr.pink
To: mr.pink; af_vet_1981; Alberta's Child; TopQuark; westerfield; Constantine XIII; Tempest; ...
Geez, over 60 posts on a Buckley thread, and nothing about a word of the day. How about sepsis?
To: Alberta's Child
I don't know what you mean by "conspiracy theory," but the only person that is really the target of my ire is Richard Perle.You wrote : "Are you defending all these morons because you have a rational reason to do so, or are you just defending them because you refuse to believe that U.S. defense policy may have been heavily influenced by agents of a foreign government for the last 30 years? "
"All these [people]" cannot refer to one man. I ask you again who are "all these Jews" you are targeting in your conspiracy theory ? Are there other Jewish members of the Bush Administration you are including ?
To: NutCrackerBoy
Geez, over 60 posts on a Buckley thread, and nothing about a word of the day. How about sepsis?
LOL...."sepsis"?....didn't Bubba have the entire Oval Office medicine cabinet filled with ointments to combat that? ;o)
Such a shame that clumsy goobers like Frum and J Goldberg are allowed within 1,000 ft of the NR building. The Buck must puke...er, regurgitate when he takes time to really think about the outrage.
67
posted on
03/02/2004 7:36:16 PM PST
by
mr.pink
To: af_vet_1981
There are multiple strings of posts on this thread -- the one in which I was referring to "all these people" was a response to a post about the group that Westerfield mentioned in one of the early messages.
It's funny how the phrase "conspiracy theory" always comes up in this kind of thread. For some people here, I suspect that the whole Pollard case was considered a "conspiracy theories" right up until the day he was convicted.
68
posted on
03/02/2004 7:46:17 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
To: Alberta's Child
To: mr.pink
Jonah Goldberg, despite inauspiciously getting his start as Scandal Boy, is very funny and very smart. Clumsy? Maybe a little.
To: Alberta's Child
Pollard is the ultimate loyalty litmus test for anti-USA, liberal, socialist, Jewish/other perverted extremist activists.
Support Pollard?
I consign you to hell with him.
Next question?
Some things are very simple.
Attempts to complicate simple truth are fairly construed as evil lies.
Pick a side, and do not deviate.
The choice is for /or against.
With the USA or aganst the USA.
Nuanced ambiguity is vastly overrated.
71
posted on
03/02/2004 8:08:26 PM PST
by
sarasmom
(Vote no on all judicial retentions. Dont vote for any new judges. Impeach the rest.)
To: NutCrackerBoy
You're right..."clumsy" is an unfair descriptive for Jonah and upon reconsideration I'll submit the adjective "adolescent" instead...hopefully he'll grow up and exchange smarmy/cuteness for responsible substance when he reaches his late forties.
One would have to think that the best teacher in the world is somewhere in the building, or if not, availible by tel.
72
posted on
03/02/2004 8:08:50 PM PST
by
mr.pink
To: sarasmom
Next question? Why is it only Jews that you target by ethnicity or religion in your religious comments ?
To: af_vet_1981
If you want to continue with a conversation here between adults, you will do the following:
1. Use the "Abuse" function to ask the Admin Moderator to remove Post #69.
2. Post your questions with accurate quotes from my previous messages.
74
posted on
03/02/2004 8:16:50 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
To: Alberta's Child
I quoted you accurately in italics. I substituted a more honorable name for the targets of your gutter words. I would like you to publicly identify the others in the Bush Administration you are targeting with your accusations.
To: af_vet_1981
I think you are going to have to answer all those questions yourself, since I had no idea all these people were Jewish until you just told me so.
76
posted on
03/02/2004 8:23:15 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
To: Alberta's Child
I think you are going to have to answer all those questions yourself, since I had no idea all these people were Jewish until you just told me so.You have already answered my question for all the world to see.
To: NutCrackerBoy; mr.pink
NutCrackerBoy wrote: Jonah Goldberg, despite inauspiciously getting his start as Scandal Boy, is very funny and very smart. Clumsy? Maybe a little.
______________________________________
Not smart, not funny, just clumsy, -- and dumb.. -- He'll never grow out of dumb.
CHANGING THE CONSTITUTION
Address:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1088708/posts
78
posted on
03/02/2004 8:26:29 PM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP.)
To: af_vet_1981
OK -- great.
79
posted on
03/02/2004 8:39:02 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
To: af_vet_1981
"Why is it only Jews that you target by ethnicity or religion in your religious comments ?"
I dont answer pointless, erroneous troll-strawmen questions.
Next question?
80
posted on
03/02/2004 8:42:17 PM PST
by
sarasmom
(Vote no on all judicial retentions. Dont vote for any new judges. Impeach the rest.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson