Skip to comments.
Challenge Threatened to Recess Appointment: Kennedy thinks appointment of Pryor is unconstitutional
Focus on the Family ^
| 2/27/04
| Keith Peters
Posted on 03/02/2004 7:00:32 AM PST by ZGuy
U.S. Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., is threatening a legal challenge to one of President Bush's recess appointments. The liberal senator claims the appointment of Alabama Attorney General William Pryor to a position on the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was unconstitutional.
At issue: Was the 10-day period when Congress was away a recess according to the Constitution? Pepperdine University Law Professor Douglas Kmiec argues that it was.
"Certainly, the modern practice of Republican and Democrat presidents alike is that intrasession appointments are constitutional so long as the recess was at least 3 days," Kmiec said.
Kennedy, however, believes that only when Congress adjourns at the end of a session does a formal recess occur, and he indicated a lawsuit was possible.
Michael Krauss, a professor of law at George Mason University, finds Kennedy's position ironic, at best.
"It's ironic to see Sen. Kennedy, who has favored the appointment of so many activist judges who care little about the text or the original intent of the Constitution, appeal to the original intent," Krauss said.
Kay Daly, who heads the Coalition for a Fair Judiciary, characterized Kennedy's threat as interference.
"The president has every right indeed every responsibility to appoint that which he believes will serve the best," Daly said.
Daly says what Kennedy is trying to do is apply a litmus test for judicial nominations.
TAKE ACTION Kennedy is a leader in the boycott by Senate Democrats of the president's judicial nominees some of whom have been kept from an up-or-down vote on their nominations for up to 2 years. The delay is neither warranted nor justified.
The nominations of Judges Carolyn Kuhl, Janice Rogers Brown and Priscilla Owen have been kept in check for far too long.
Please contact your senators and let them know: 1) that it is not the Senate's role to decide who the nation's judges will be; 2) The Senate's role is only to "advise and consent" to nominations; and 3) If senators oppose a candidate, they should vote accordingly on the Senate floor. But it is unconscionable for any nominee to wait this long to find out if they are going to have the opportunity to serve.
TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: billpryor; bush43; democratscheat; judicialnominees; recessappointments; tedkennedy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
03/02/2004 7:00:32 AM PST
by
ZGuy
To: ZGuy
2
posted on
03/02/2004 7:02:23 AM PST
by
areafiftyone
(Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
To: ZGuy
In his next life this guy will be a barnacle living under Chappaquidic bridge.....
3
posted on
03/02/2004 7:03:01 AM PST
by
clintonh8r
(Vietnam veteran against John Kerry.)
To: ZGuy
A Consitutional scholar weighs in.
4
posted on
03/02/2004 7:08:38 AM PST
by
Wally_Kalbacken
(Seldom right, never in doubt!)
To: Wally_Kalbacken
Would someone please re-post Teddy, the Swimmer in his neck brace photo...
To: clintonh8r
In his next life this guy will be a barnacle living under Chappaquidic bridge.....Or he'll be a $2 bottle of hootch like Night Train or Mad Dog 20/20.
6
posted on
03/02/2004 7:14:09 AM PST
by
CFC__VRWC
(AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - don't liberals just kill ya?)
To: ZGuy
The Democrats efforts to impose a religious test excluding traditional Christian believers from the federal judiciary is what's unconstitutional.
To: ZGuy
We should find some way of suing the RAT senators for not doing their job as per the Constitution.
8
posted on
03/02/2004 7:16:47 AM PST
by
justshutupandtakeit
(America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
To: justshutupandtakeit
Can we sue Kerry for being AWOL from the Senate?
Actually he does us a favor but that's beside the point.
9
posted on
03/02/2004 7:18:31 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
To: areafiftyone
I'll morn that Fat assed worthless maggot for about a millisecond when he dies.
Then I will proceed to make reservations to visit his resting place and Piss all over it.
10
posted on
03/02/2004 7:22:59 AM PST
by
Area51
(RINO Hunter, Big Time.)
To: ZGuy
The reasoning put forth is specious at best, and probably rooted in a totally dishonest interpretation of the Constitution. Inaction by the Senate is no excuse for denying the timely filling of vacant judicial positions.
To: Area51; areafiftyone
That would be a waste of perfectly good urine.
Rejoice in knowing Ted Kennedy is going to Hell.
12
posted on
03/02/2004 7:28:19 AM PST
by
Cyber Ninja
(His legacy is a stain on the dress.)
To: ZGuy
The former submarine commander is blabbering again. Its funny everything President Bush does is illegal but what Clintoon did was perfectly fine.
13
posted on
03/02/2004 7:29:58 AM PST
by
Piquaboy
To: ZGuy
Kennedy can solve this constitutional crisis by allowing an up or down vote on Pryor.
14
posted on
03/02/2004 7:30:12 AM PST
by
Cooter
To: ZGuy
Kennedy thinks appointment of Pryor is unconstitutionalI belive this raises very serious Pot and Kettle issues.
To: Piquaboy
Former submarine commander...
To: ZGuy
What's needed is a counter suit by Pryor charging Kennedy's filibuster as unconstitutional interference in the President's power to appoint judges. A filibuster isn't giving "advice and consent [or rejection]", it is preventing it.
17
posted on
03/02/2004 7:38:03 AM PST
by
LexBaird
("I don't do diplomacy." - Donald Rumsfeld)
To: ZGuy
Mr. Kennedy, can you tell me whether a Democrat president has ever made a recess appointment and, if so, did you oppose such appointments? Hello? Hello?
18
posted on
03/02/2004 7:39:00 AM PST
by
Fresh Wind
(Who would a terrorist vote for?)
To: Area51
Then I will proceed to make reservations to visit his resting place and Piss all over it.Since I would not waste the funds to get to Massachusetts to do the act myself, I wonder if any enterprising individual has set up a Piss-On-Your-GraveaGram service.
To: ZGuy
The good news is that Kennedy will not be serving in the Senate for a heck of a lot longer.
20
posted on
03/02/2004 7:41:43 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson