To: RockChucker
"It was unclear if the shooter, who may have used an AK-47, was shooting from inside or outside the home."
Ok, let's disect this:
1. How can you not be sure if the shots were fired from inside or outside the home? Where are the shells laying?
2. May have used an AK-47? How do they determine this, either it was or it wasn't. If there are no 7.62x39 shells to be found, it wasn't used.
The answer is to ban gangs.
76 posted on
03/02/2004 6:43:56 AM PST by
looscnnn
("Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils" Gen. John Stark 1809)
To: looscnnn
"The answer is to ban gangs."
The real answer is to remove all restrictions (infringements) concerning the 2nd Amendment. Allow open carry (Wyatt Earp style) everywhere and at all times. Society will quickly weed out the "demon seed" and national security / personal safety will ensue!
The framers of the Constitution weren't stupid. Today's professional career politicians are.
To: looscnnn
The senator on the floor, who is stumbling over his words, almost said, "The Senators who want to regis.. uh, gun..."
You mean "register", right?
To: looscnnn
If there are no 7.62x39 shells to be found, it wasn't used. Not entirely true. A SAR-2 type rifle has the same external cosmetic look as an AK (sans half-moon muzzle break), has an AK action, but shoots a 5.45mm round. They're most recognizable for the bright orange magazines.
Similarly, a SAR-3 type rifle has the same cosmetic look as an AK (sans half-moon muzzle break), has an AK action, but shoots a .223Rem round
109 posted on
03/02/2004 6:59:14 AM PST by
Tree of Liberty
("The less a man makes declarative statements, the less apt he is to look foolish in retrospect.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson