Skip to comments.
‘Memogate’ report delayed as new witness steps forward
The Hill ^
| 3-1-04
| Alexander Bolton
Posted on 03/01/2004 6:00:17 PM PST by Indy Pendance
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: Indy Pendance
"The probes latest turn seems to reflect concerns voiced by Senate Democrats over the administrations level of involvement in what some Democrats now refer to as 'Memogate.'"
Uh... no. *I* coined the term "memo-gate", and it refers to the *substance* of those democrat memos.
21
posted on
03/01/2004 7:01:36 PM PST
by
jmstein7
(Real Men Don't Need Chunks of Government Metal on Their Chests to be Heroes)
To: Indy Pendance
Is this what they mean when they say they have an "intern problem"?
Miranda has rights and should be reinstated immediately.
22
posted on
03/01/2004 7:38:53 PM PST
by
GEC
To: Indy Pendance
The house and senate could have been operating separate conputers for each party all along. Politics being what it is, why didn't they? I guess the "independant" member would get access to both systems, gratis the RATS, so he could scrounge for the RATS.
23
posted on
03/01/2004 8:09:32 PM PST
by
Waco
To: Indy Pendance
INTREP - demoRATS caught in the trap
To: anniegetyourgun
You got that right!
I loved the statement .. "contained folders belonging to Judiciary staff, from what I could tell, of both Republicans and Democrats". Which means that the DEMOCRATS were reading all the repub memos and they have been lying about it all this time, trying to get people to believe that the dems HAD NO ACCESS TO REPUB STUFF.
I hope it hits the fan tomorrow!!
25
posted on
03/01/2004 9:53:25 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: Indy Pendance
In little time, I became aware that by clicking onto the icon My Network Places followed, as I recall, by the icon Network Connections, one could, intentionally or unintentionally, enter a panel that contained folders belonging to Judiciary staff, from what I could tell, of both Republicans and Democrats. I made this discovery quite easily while searching for the shared network for constituent letter models." I have an idea for a cute graphic that a Freeper could make out of this...
I am imagining a Microsoft style menu under the Network Places, and it has folder icons in the directory labelled:
- Democrat Judiciary:
- Court packing plan
- FilibusterStrategy.doc
- Plans Against CIA and Bush White House
- Ted Kennedy Scandal File - Top Secret, do not open
- Names to call Minority Conservatives
- Hillary's Home
- Rose law firm records
- FBI files on opponents
- Chinese (money) Laundry
- Living History Notes
- Whitewater
- Vast Right Wing Conspiracy
26
posted on
03/01/2004 9:58:09 PM PST
by
WOSG
(If we call Republicans the "Grand Old Party" lets call Democrats the Corrupt Radical Activist Party.)
To: r9etb
That's the thing, r9etb. Dems DID have access to the Repubs memos. There is a Reuters quote I'm looking for now that I noted had Senator Daschle admitting that yes, indeedy, they had access to Republican materials.
A mere blip on the radar screen though, apparently. What do we hear about that statement? Nothing, zip, nada. Crickets.
To: All
To: Indy Pendance
What is controversial is not the nominations of the President, it's the tactics of the President's opponents, and their smears of the nominees and conspiracy to capitalize on their own smears. All of which were documented in poorly protected files.
29
posted on
03/01/2004 10:27:24 PM PST
by
hocndoc
(Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
To: diotima; Bob J; abner; Interesting Times
PING!
To: WOSG
very good
To: ConservativeGadfly
Amazing stuff.
32
posted on
03/02/2004 7:48:52 AM PST
by
abner
(FREE THE MIRANDA MEMOS! http://www.intelmemo.com or http://www.wintersoldier.com)
To: atomicpossum
Another poster on this topic had a great point: he said why should the Democrats be trusted with national security if they can't even protect their own memos? Of course, it turns out the Republicans may not have been much better!
To: GraceCoolidge
True, but perhaps the Republicans had nothing to hide in the first place.
34
posted on
03/02/2004 8:05:57 AM PST
by
KenD
To: Indy Pendance
Computers are almost NEVER secure.
I'll bet the Senate's firewalls were so porous that even
the intelligence agencies of Red China have no trouble
browsing whatever files they please.
And I'll bet many of those computers have also picked up
a few trojan horses that occasionally 'phone home' with
juicy information.
You can thank Bill Gates for creating an operating system
that is so prone to spying.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson