Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Record Number of Electronic Ballots to Be Cast on Super Tuesday
Associated Press ^ | Mar 1, 2004 | Rachel Konrad

Posted on 03/01/2004 5:51:45 PM PST by BenLurkin

SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) - With a record number of voters casting electronic ballots on Super Tuesday, election officials from California to Maryland are beefing up security to prevent problems ranging from software glitches to hackers. In California, new security measures range from random tests of touch-screen machines by independent computer experts to a recommendation that poll workers prevent voters from carrying cell phones or other wireless devices into voting booths.

At least 10 million people in at least two dozen states are expected to cast primary ballots on machines built by Diebold, Sequoia Voting Systems, Electronic Systems & Software and other vendors.

And the electronic voting trend is accelerating: By November's presidential election, at least 50 million people will vote on touch-screens, compared with 55 million using paper, punch cards or lever machines, according to Washington-based Election Data Services.

Voting registrars say paperless ballots save money and eliminate hanging chads and other problems associated with antiquated systems. It's impossible to accidentally vote twice on a touch-screen, and the machines can toggle between different languages for people who don't speak English.

"The modernization of the nation's voting infrastructure is long overdue," said Alfie Charles, spokesman for Oakland-based Sequoia, which builds the machines as many as 4 million voters in California and Maryland will use Tuesday.

But computer scientists have been protesting the switch. They're particularly concerned that few of the computers provide paper records, making it nearly impossible to have meaningful recounts, or to prove that vote tampering hasn't occurred.

Politicians, voter-rights advocates and even some secretaries of state have recently acknowledged that the systems could theoretically fail - with catastrophic consequences. In several software and hardware tests, critics have shown it's easy to jam microchip-embedded smart cards into machines, or alter and delete some votes - in some cases simply by ripping out wires. They've cracked passwords to gain access to computer servers and showed that some systems relying on Microsoft Windows lacked up-to-date security patches that should have been downloaded from the Internet.

California Secretary of State Kevin Shelley issued recommendations last month for elections officials to bolster security in 12 counties using touch-screens. Those counties account for about 41 percent of California's registered voters.

He demanded that Diebold Inc., the North Canton, Ohio-based manufacturer of touch-screen systems, provide his office with the "source code" of its elections software.

Diebold promptly complied, and company representatives traveled to California on Monday to help poll workers if they have problems. "We're already out here to work with our customers to ensure a safe, secure and accurate election," spokesman David Bear said in a phone interview from San Diego.

Shelley also wants independent, random tests of touch-screen machines.

Maryland, which spent $55.6 million on 16,000 touch-screen computers earlier this year, is also taking precautions.

Computer experts there told lawmakers in January that the hardware contained "vulnerabilities that could be exploited by malicious individuals." Among their surprises: all of Maryland's machines had two identical locks, which could be opened by any one of 32,000 keys. They also found it easy to pick the locks.

Linda Lamone, Maryland's elections administrator, said each machine would be covered in security "tamper tape" and include a protective seal. The tape changes from black to red if someone tries to remove it.

"We're good to go," Lamone said. "We have tested this equipment extensively, and there is absolutely no evidence that there's been any tampering."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: California; US: Maryland; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: easytorig; electronicvoting; rigged

1 posted on 03/01/2004 5:51:45 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
I hear that quite a few will be cast by the living.
2 posted on 03/01/2004 5:52:53 PM PST by Paul Atreides (Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Wonder if Colma voters will be out in force tomorrow (a city where the dead outnumber the living). They certainly have friends up there to help them.
3 posted on 03/01/2004 5:55:21 PM PST by Simmy2.5 (Kerry. When you need to ketchup...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
I hear that quite a few will be cast by the living.

Wow that's a nice change for a DEMOCRATIC Primary, how many times can they vote?

4 posted on 03/01/2004 5:55:53 PM PST by PeteFromMontana (The only IMPEACHED, DISBARRED President? A Democrat...remind your friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PeteFromMontana
It all depends on how many clones and pets they have.
5 posted on 03/01/2004 5:57:33 PM PST by Paul Atreides (Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides; Simmy2.5
This guy is one to watch out for. Definitely a big government limo lib infiltrating the computer system:
6 posted on 03/01/2004 6:04:31 PM PST by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Joe Stalin was right: it doesn't matter who casts the votes, what matters is who writes the software.
7 posted on 03/01/2004 6:31:41 PM PST by Reelect President Dubya (Drug prohibition laws help support terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reelect President Dubya
It doesn't matter which side of the left - right divide you're on, black box voting is a bad idea if you believe in democracy, especially after the hackers showed how easy it was to get into the Diebold site. Black box voting is only good for the executives of Diebold, and the election "officials" who will soon become Diebold "consultants".
8 posted on 03/01/2004 8:31:20 PM PST by Peter vE (Ceterum censeo: delenda est Carthago.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
mmmmmm. Yesss. Vote for Wellstone...Kerry...
9 posted on 03/01/2004 8:37:44 PM PST by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson