Skip to comments.
Hussein Skimmed Billions from UN Food for Oil Program
New York Times ^
| 2/29/2004
| Susan Sachs
Posted on 03/01/2004 1:47:39 PM PST by bukkdems
Follow the money. Saddam not only manipulated foreign supporters with profitable oil vouchers, he also skimmed off an average of 10% commision on every product delivered to Iraq through the Oil for Food Program. Much of the stuff was unuseable junk. UN inspectors winked.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: corruption; hussein; iraq; iraqoilvouchers; oilforfood; oilforfoodprogram; saddam; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: brownsfan
I think that is how Hitlery described it.
CG
21
posted on
03/01/2004 2:11:47 PM PST
by
Conspiracy Guy
(The word "Tagline" needs to be added to Free Republic's Spell Check.)
To: ravingnutter
Some blockbuster... Freepers have known about this corruption for over a year now.First of all, you couldn't have know about this corruption for over a year since the documents detailing the scam were only found several months ago post liberation. It is a blockbuster once the elite press like the NYT start covering it. Without such coverage, the story becomes just another "rumor" or "right wing fabrication." I am glad the NYT is covering the story so the Brokaws, Jennings, Rathers, et al start mentioning it as well.
22
posted on
03/01/2004 2:13:18 PM PST
by
kabar
To: Mitchell
What about others, in the U.N., Europe, or the U.S.? According to Claudia Rossette
Kofi Annan put himself in charge of the "Oil for Palaces (excuse me...Food)" program.
23
posted on
03/01/2004 2:13:48 PM PST
by
Allan
To: bukkdems
Yeah, but are they going to follow the money trail and then urge that Clinton give some of it back or is this another one of the White Water scams that Willie is going to get away with. It is because of the Saddam oil scam money that flowed into the White House that Vince Foster died and Suzie spent 18 months in jail rather than say anything.
24
posted on
03/01/2004 2:14:39 PM PST
by
Tacis
To: Conspiracy Guy
He seemed like such a nice despot who cared about women's rights and all.As long as the women "stayed out of his way", as Hillary likes to point out.
25
posted on
03/01/2004 2:15:54 PM PST
by
cyncooper
("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
To: cyncooper
Sort of like her. Hillary likes everyone who stays out of her way. Others go mysteriously missing.
CG
26
posted on
03/01/2004 2:18:01 PM PST
by
Conspiracy Guy
(The word "Tagline" needs to be added to Free Republic's Spell Check.)
To: kabar
I am glad the NYT is covering the story so the Brokaws, Jennings, Rathers, et al start mentioning it as well. Let's see if they give it as much time as Halliburton's alleged wrongdoing or regular efforts to paint the President as an anti-Human Rights, fascist who sexed up the WMD threat. I am not holding my breath. Had the President held off and let the French lead a coalition to depose Saddam, we would be seeing a story a day on Saddam's atrocities.
27
posted on
03/01/2004 2:46:30 PM PST
by
Dolphy
To: bukkdems
UN inspectors winked. Winked? Hell. Tell the truth. They took bribes just like the bottom-feeding cleptocrats they are.
Only an idiot would allow that corrupt organization to have a say in our foreign policy.
28
posted on
03/01/2004 2:51:57 PM PST
by
Ditto
( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
To: bukkdems
DUH
To: anniegetyourgun
"UN inspectors winked." Must be tough for the NYTimes to admit this about their favorite charity.
Must have a new reporter of something.
30
posted on
03/01/2004 3:02:17 PM PST
by
alrea
(create jobs with tax cuts, school vouchers, and tort reform)
To: kabar
...i've known about this corruption ever since it started (albeit without documented proof). at the least, i theorized it was happening as did most other people with any common sense. we've known forever saddam was a brutal dictator who was living beyond his means, so why wouldn't he be scamming cash out of the un monies? i do agree with you about why this is a blockbuster story. i just wonder how many idiots (who worship such rags as the nyt), who are hearing about this now, think it's news...
31
posted on
03/01/2004 3:13:51 PM PST
by
cweese
To: marlon
Hillary Rodham Clinton told us just last week that women were much better off under Sadaam Amazing how much money can be made taking care of citizens.
32
posted on
03/01/2004 3:43:43 PM PST
by
alrea
(create jobs with tax cuts, school vouchers, and tort reform)
To: bukkdems
Hussein Skimmed Billions from UN Food for Oil Program So did the UN.
33
posted on
03/01/2004 3:47:34 PM PST
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Pick my weapon? Ok I choose sledge hammers.... in seven feet of water.)
To: bukkdems
Surprise Surprise!
34
posted on
03/01/2004 3:49:18 PM PST
by
dalebert
To: Dolphy
Had the President held off and let the French lead a coalition to depose Saddam, we would be seeing a story a day on Saddam's atrocities.
Let's see what the coverage is when Saddam is placed on trial. I wish Bush would start the trial this Summer, but I have read that they are talking about the trial beginning in about two years. Hearing the stories of mass murder, torture, rape, etc. would have an impact on our upcoming election, but it won't happen.
35
posted on
03/01/2004 3:59:56 PM PST
by
kabar
To: kabar
This is a blockbuster story...Come on, don't be naive, there is no way this minor, insignificant story will get any play by the major news/print media when the CATACLYSMIC news event of the century is in the headlines now. You know......"Aristide was Kidnapped"!!
36
posted on
03/01/2004 4:05:37 PM PST
by
PISANO
(Our troops...... will NOT tire...will NOT falter.....and WILL NOT FAIL!!!)
To: cweese
Agree. I have been following it ever since the WSJ article, but the story has never gained any traction until, hopefully, now. We are talking about mass corruption among the political class of numerous countries and the UN. It gives us a rare glimpse of how international relations are influenced by bribes and payoffs rather than national interests and moral principles. The Brits are investigating it seriously, but I doubt if the French will do anything, and I know the Russians won't.
The US should make all the facts known and let the chips fall where they may, but I think the USG will use the information behind the scenes to influence decisions under the threat of making the facts public.
37
posted on
03/01/2004 4:07:12 PM PST
by
kabar
To: PISANO
Come on, don't be naive, there is no way this minor, insignificant story will get any play by the major news/print media when the CATACLYSMIC news event of the century is in the headlines now. You know......"Aristide was Kidnapped"!!
I am not being naive. The NYT is considered to be part of the "major" media. It sets the agenda for the nightly TV news and most of the other domestic papers. Moreover it has an international impact. The question is whether the NYT will make this a one time story or pursue it more vigorously--like the way they got everyone to talk about the boycott of the Masters.
38
posted on
03/01/2004 4:12:45 PM PST
by
kabar
To: kabar
"I am glad the NYT is covering the story so the Brokaws, Jennings, Rathers, et al start mentioning it as well."
I'll believe that when I see it with my own eyes and hear it with my own ears. These boys aren't going to mention anything unless it happens to make Bush look bad.
39
posted on
03/01/2004 4:22:08 PM PST
by
Arpege92
To: bukkdems
Millions might be "skimming". Billions counts as "gouging".
40
posted on
03/01/2004 6:00:59 PM PST
by
JasonC
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson