[Last Visible Dog]

There is nothing currently scientific about intelligent design. That may change, but until then, ID has no place in a science classroom.

Next time try actually reading the article.

From the article:

"The standards did not say that schools should teach intelligent design"

[ThinkPlease]

"The standards did not say that schools should teach intelligent design"

Explicitly, no, they don't. But then, just about every "controversy" in the lesson is a Chapter in Wells' book, isn't it? A duck by any other name is still a duck. It quacks like a duck, it looks like a duck, it must be a duck.

Of course, I ask again, did you actually read the lesson plan, or did you let someone else do the interpretation for you?

[Ichneumon]

[There is nothing currently scientific about intelligent design. That may change, but until then, ID has no place in a science classroom.]

Next time try actually reading the article.

Next time try actually reading the thread.

This has already been addressed.