Those are not examples of "irreducible complexity", as you claim they are. But you're invited to provide your proofs that they are, if you think you can. Be sure to show your work.
Note: You'd be wise not to rely on previous creationist sources for information on the bombadier beetle, they're flat wrong on several issues, and Behe's discussion of the flagella overlooks several fundamental things which render his argument invalid.
Take a stab at it yourself, if you like.
I assume you are going to pretend they don't exist.
I see that you often make incorrect assumptions.
My goal is only to point out the vacuous nature of your statements.
You have failed at your goal.
Really. Please explain why you think they are not examples of irreducible complexity. Like you said - be sure to show your work.
Note: You'd be wise not to rely on previous creationist sources for information on the bombadier beetle, they're flat wrong on several issues
Please explain how they are wrong. Like you said - be sure to show your work.
LVD:I assume you [balrog666] are going to pretend they don't exist.
Ichneumon: I see that you often make incorrect assumptions.
Speaking of incorrect assumptions, that comment was not addressed to you. (you too are not very good at this game)