Ichneumon: No one has made that claim either. Lie much?
Speaking of making a fool out of yourself
RWP(#53): Behe hasn't published in the biochemical literature (as far as I can tell) since 1997; Johnson is a lawyer, and his opinion of evolution is probably as valuable as my opinion of tort law; I can't find a single paper in the scientific (as opposed to mathematical) literature by Dembski; and who's the fourth guy?
Ichneumon, make a fool out of yourself much?
Behe's contribution to the scientific literature had nothing whatsoever to do with ID or testing the validity of evolution. The others are not professional scientists.
Ichneumon: No one has made that claim either. Lie much?
LVD: Speaking of making a fool out of yourself
RWP(#53): Behe hasn't published in the biochemical literature (as far as I can tell) since 1997; Johnson is a lawyer, and his opinion of evolution is probably as valuable as my opinion of tort law; I can't find a single paper in the scientific (as opposed to mathematical) literature by Dembski; and who's the fourth guy?
Okay, I'll bite -- where did he call any of them "not a 'real' scientist"? Pointing out that Johnson is indeed not a scientist of any sort doesn't count.
Ichneumon, make a fool out of yourself much?