Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Return of a Legislative Legend: Debating "cop-killers." [Ammunition]
National Review Online ^ | Dave Kopel

Posted on 03/01/2004 9:34:04 AM PST by xsysmgr

As the Senate considers legislation to prohibit abusive lawsuits against Second Amendment rights, Sen. Ted Kennedy is offering an amendment to ban ammunition. Kennedy claims that he is aiming at "cop-killer" bullets, but he appears to be badly misinformed on the issue.

There never has been any such thing as a "cop-killer" bullet. The issue is a fiction, invented for purposes of politics, not public safety. In any case, since 1986, federal law has prohibited the rare types of handgun ammunition that have unusual abilities to penetrate body armor.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives reports that current ammunition laws are fully sufficient to protect the police, and that attempts to change these laws could actually lead to increased police fatalities. Notwithstanding this strong warning, some lobbyists and politicians continue to play on public misunderstanding, by using the so-called "cop-killer" issue to demand the power to ban standard rifle ammunition used for hunting.

POLITICAL ORIGINS

The story of the nonexistent "cop-killer" bullet actually begins in 1976 in Massachusetts, when a handgun-confiscation initiative was defeated in a landslide. Then, in 1982 in California, a handgun-"freeze" initiative also lost overwhelmingly. The gun-prohibition lobbies began to realize that they would have to work more incrementally, rather than pushing for prohibition outright.

The prohibition lobbies also realized that the police were one of their worst problems. While a few police chiefs or sheriffs could always be found to support prohibition, the vast majority of police — both commanders and line officers — were "pro-gun," and extremely skeptical of gun control. Something had to be done to turn the police (or at least their Washington lobbyists) against the National Rifle Association.

The something, ironically, was an obscure type of ammunition invented by police officers two decades before. These bullets were known as KTW bullets, after the initials of the three persons who invented them for use in SWAT teams: Dr. Paul Kopsch and two police officers named Turcus and Ward.

While ordinary bullets have a lead core, the KTW bullets used brass or iron. The KTW bullet has a conical shape, and was especially designed for shooting through glass or a car door. Of course neither the KTW bullet nor any other bullet was invented for the purpose of killing police officers.

KTW bullets have not been available for sale to the general public since the 1960s.

TEFLON BULLETS?

"Cop-killer" bullets are sometimes called "Teflon bullets," but this name reflects a serious misunderstanding. For example, in the movie Lethal Weapon 3, a so-called "Teflon bullet" from a medium-power handgun was supposedly able to penetrate several inches of hardened steel on a bulldozer blade. In the real world, however, no bullet could possibly perform such a stunt.

Actually, a Teflon coating is applied to the outside of a wide variety of ordinary ammunition. Teflon reduces the lead abrasion caused by the bullet's movement down the barrel of the gun. Thus, the barrel is kept cleaner, and is protected from excessive wear. Also, reduced abrasion means that fewer tiny lead air particles are produced, so the air is cleaner — an especially important consideration at indoor shooting ranges.

In addition, a Teflon coating on a bullet also makes the bullet safer to use in a self-defense context. The Teflon helps the bullet "grab" a hard surface such as glass or metal, and thus significantly reduces the risk of a dangerous ricochet. Similarly, canes or walking sticks are often coated with Teflon, so that they will not slip on hard, smooth surfaces.

So in order to reduce ricochets, KTW bullets as well as many ordinary types of defensive ammunition use Teflon or similar substances.

BODY ARMOR

As police officers know, the vests that they wear are "bullet-resistant," not "bullet-proof." The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives explains that "armor protection is rated in accordance with a specific threat. There is no such thing as 'bullet-proof' armor."

Manufactured from Kevlar (a synthetic fiber that is five times stronger than steel), body armor comes in a variety of grades. The higher the grade, the bulkier and less comfortable the armor is to wear, but the more ammunition it can stop. The highest grades of armor are often called "tactical armor" or "hard armor," and may contain steel or titanium.

At the top of the scale is Threat Level IV armor, which can stop even a high-powered rifle bullet. It takes a very strong vest to stop a big-game hunting-rifle bullet: The bullet travels at a high velocity, due to the long length of the rifle barrel; and has a large mass, since a hunting-rifle bullet must be large enough to bring down a moose, elk, or other large mammal.

Almost the only people who wear hard armor are SWAT team members on high-risk missions. Far more common for ordinary police use is "soft" body armor, made from Kevlar, and rated at Threat Levels IIA through IIIA. Level IIA armor can stop most handgun ammunition, while Level IIIA can stop almost any handgun bullet. Handgun ammunition is much easier to stop than rifle ammunition, since the handgun barrel is much shorter (less velocity) and handgun bullets are smaller (less mass).

POLICE OFFICER SAFETY

Even before the 1986 law restricting "armor-piercing ammunition," there had never been a case of a police officer killed with such ammunition penetrating a vest. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms studied every police-officer shooting in the years 1985-94 and reported: "No law enforcement officer in the United States has died as a result of a round of armor piercing ammunition, as defined, having been fired from a handgun, subsequently penetrating an officer's protective body armor causing lethal injuries."

Indeed, the BATF concluded that in the period studied, there had not been any instances of officers being killed by any type of handgun ammunition penetrating body armor.

Unfortunately, some public officials have made misleading claims about officer safety. For example, in 1995 President Clinton announced his support for a massive new ban on many ordinary types of ammunition. In the speech, President Clinton spoke emotionally about a Chicago police officer who had been fatally shot because a "cop-killer" bullet penetrated his vest. There was only one problem with the story: It wasn't true. The officer was shot by a criminal who used ordinary ammunition. One shot hit the officer in the head. Another shot went through an opening in the vest. No shot penetrated the vest.

CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION

Although the "cop-killer"-bullet issue had no factual substance, it was politically potent. As with so many other terms invented by gun-prohibition lobbyists, the very name served to bias the debate in favor of prohibition. The national media showed little interest in reporting facts such as the origin of the KTW bullet, or that the KTW was not for sale to the public, or that no police officer had ever been shot at or killed with such a bullet, or that Teflon didn't make bullets more powerful.

Once the bait was set, the switch was made. New York Democratic Rep. Mario Biaggi (who would later leave Congress due to felony convictions involving extensive personal corruption) introduced a bill to outlaw all ammunition capable of penetrating soft body armor if fired from a handgun with a six-inch barrel. This could lead to a ban on most rifle ammunition, since most rifle ammunition will penetrate soft body armor, and many common types of rifle ammunition fit some handguns. Soft body armor is designed to stop handgun ammunition, not rifle ammunition.

When this fact was pointed out, media figures sneered that gun owners wanted to go deer-hunting with cop-killer Teflon bullets — as if deer were wearing body armor.

As the debated continued, the constant repetition of the phrase "cop-killer bullet" helped drive a wedge between Second Amendment groups and many police officers. The Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) — the largest rank-and-file police group in the U.S. — had been an enthusiastic supporter of the McClure-Volkmer Firearms Owners' Protection Act (FOPA), a bill to reform abusive enforcement of the 1968 Gun Control Act.

But after the "cop-killer" controversy, the police group's director switched sides, and announced that FOPA was a grave threat to the lives of police officers. FOPA itself had nothing to do with KTW or Teflon ammunition, but the FOP director's broader point was his anger over the "cop-killer bullet" issue.

Many of the friends of the Second Amendment in Congress and the Reagan White House quietly insisted that something be done to get rid of the controversy.

THE FEDERAL BAN

Accordingly, the National Rifle Association and Representative Biaggi reached a compromise: Instead of a penetration standard (which would ban most rifle ammunition), a content standard was adopted. The sale or import of handgun ammunition with a significant amount of steel, titanium, or other metal core was outlawed. (The relevant federal regulation specifies that: "armor piercing ammunition" is a handgun bullet "constructed entirely" from " tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper, or depleted uranium," or with certain kinds of jackets on the bullet.)

An important new protection in the compromise bill required that "armor-piercing ammunition" be so labeled. This prevented people from being prosecuted for the unwitting sale of the newly restricted ammunition. For example, some surplus ammunition imported from Czechoslovakia contained a solid core, rather than a lead core, because there had been a lead shortage in the Czechoslovakia when the ammunition was manufactured.

Biaggi pronounced that the compromise achieved everything he had wanted from the original bill. The NRA spread the word that the vote for the compromise would not be scored as a "wrong" vote.

Severe mandatory prison sentences were enacted for use of federally defined "armor-piercing ammunition" in a violent or drug-trafficking crime. The rarity of the actual misuse of such unusual ammunition is demonstrated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms study of firearms crime in 1985-94, which found that there had only been four prosecutions for use of the ammunition in a crime.

BANNING HUNTING AMMUNITION?


The 1997 BATFE report on the threat to police officers from criminal use of ammunition concluded: "Because the existing laws are working, no additional legislation regarding such laws is necessary. In this matter, to err on the conservative side of the existing status quo laws is to avoid any experimentation with police officer lives that could conceivably lead to numerous additional officer fatalities."

Unfortunately, gun-prohibition lobbies and their congressional allies have continued to call for such dangerous "experimentation," notwithstanding the strong opposition of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.

Under current proposals, if a bullet can penetrate soft body armor (which is designed to stop handguns, not rifles), it could be outlawed. The Kennedy amendment refers to ammunition "designed" to have "armor-piercing capability." How can one know the inner mind of someone who designed a bullet, perhaps decades ago?

The Kennedy amendment refers to rifle ammunition that has more penetrating capability than "standard" ammunition of the same caliber. In other words, a bureaucrat could decide that "standard" ammunition in a certain caliber has a certain weight and velocity, and any round with a greater weight or velocity could be administratively prohibited.

As the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives urges, the safest approach is to leave existing laws in place — rather than frightening the public and endangering the police in order to score political points. The Fraternal Order of Police agrees, and opposes the Kennedy amendment.

David Kopel is the research director at the Independence Institute.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: ammo; bang; banglist; batf; copkillers; fmcdh; fop; guncontrol; hollowpoints; peoplecontrol; tedkennedy

1 posted on 03/01/2004 9:34:08 AM PST by xsysmgr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
What kind of ammunition would a hunter use to take down an animal that is about 300 pounds in weight? Say a 300 pound hog: Or a pygmy hippo: OR . . .
2 posted on 03/01/2004 9:41:02 AM PST by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bang_list
This was clearly written for a general audience so I suppose we can let the generalizations slide.
3 posted on 03/01/2004 9:41:38 AM PST by Fixit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
Trying again.
4 posted on 03/01/2004 11:28:57 AM PST by Fixit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
Fine tuning the errors (why didn't he get a gun geek to edit the piece?):

>>For example, in the movie Lethal Weapon 3, a so-called "Teflon bullet" from a medium-power handgun was supposedly able to penetrate several inches of hardened steel on a bulldozer blade.

Bulldozers don't use hardened steel, they use mild steel because it is tougher.

In the real world, however, no bullet could possibly perform such a stunt.

>>Also, reduced abrasion means that fewer tiny lead air particles are produced, so the air is cleaner — an especially important consideration at indoor shooting ranges.

Most bullets are copper jacketed (so any or this phantom "abrasion" would be copper particles.) Those who shoot old-fashioned lead slugs rarely use teflon, and no manufacturer sells a teflon coated lead slug that I am aware of.

>>The Teflon helps the bullet "grab" a hard surface such as glass or metal, and thus significantly reduces the risk of a dangerous ricochet.

Nonsense. Teflon reduces friction. The key is that hard steel and brass bullets that do "bite" into angled windshields and door panels need to be teflon coated to avoid barrel damage.

>>Similarly, canes or walking sticks are often coated with Teflon, so that they will not slip on hard, smooth surfaces.

Hard to believe.

It would be nice if our side would be scrupulously accurate on such accuracy-sensitive issues.
5 posted on 03/01/2004 11:43:12 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
Must be that new grippy teflon.
6 posted on 03/01/2004 12:33:09 PM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fixit
Ted Kennedy has a long range plan. If it takes 20 years, or thirty, he will have lead ammunition banned.

The begining of this was with the lead shot ban for Federal Migratory Birds. This type of ban has trickled down to the state level in some areas.

The second and current stage is a ban on lead for Salt Water fishing and fishing in Federal Waters. The environmental wackos have been pushing for fresh water ban of ALL lead fishing supplies. If he can complete this stage, he will have two precedents.

If he can make two precendents, then in the name of the "environment" he wants a total Federal ban on lead ammunition. Most substitutes for lead in hand gun ammunition could fall under "armor piercing".

Right now, it looks like he is setting the definitions.

7 posted on 03/01/2004 12:50:37 PM PST by Deguello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
Kennedy claims that he is aiming at "cop-killer" bullets, but he appears to be badly misinformed on the issue.

Ya think?

8 posted on 03/01/2004 1:05:49 PM PST by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
...a so-called "Teflon bullet" from a medium-power handgun was supposedly able to penetrate several inches of hardened steel on a bulldozer blade. In the real world, however, no bullet could possibly perform such a stunt.

No handgun bullet. A .50 BMG AP round is designed to do just that.

9 posted on 03/01/2004 5:21:00 PM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
Accordingly, the National Rifle Association and Representative Biaggi reached a compromise: Instead of a penetration standard (which would ban most rifle ammunition), a content standard was adopted. The sale or import of handgun ammunition with a significant amount of steel, titanium, or other metal core was outlawed. (The relevant federal regulation specifies that: "armor piercing ammunition" is a handgun bullet "constructed entirely" from " tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper, or depleted uranium," or with certain kinds of jackets on the bullet.) An important new protection in the compromise bill required that "armor-piercing ammunition" be so labeled. This prevented people from being prosecuted for the unwitting sale of the newly restricted ammunition. For example, some surplus ammunition imported from Czechoslovakia contained a solid core, rather than a lead core, because there had been a lead shortage in the Czechoslovakia when the ammunition was manufactured. Biaggi pronounced that the compromise achieved everything he had wanted from the original bill. The NRA spread the word that the vote for the compromise would not be scored as a "wrong" vote.

Another (in)famous NRA compromise. This one eventually resulted in the banning of imported ammunition with steel cores, because even though primarily a rifle rounds, there were a few pistols chambered for the round. This sort of thing would affect .223/5.56x45, .30 M1 Carbine, and 7.62x39, not even considering the Thompson Contender type of handgun, which adds a whole bunch more rifle calibers to the potential ban list.

10 posted on 03/01/2004 5:29:36 PM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

Thanks for posting this as I was about to do the same. Somehow, I missed it at that time.


11 posted on 05/29/2004 1:48:17 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fourdeuce82d; Joe Brower; Shooter 2.5; DMZFrank; Mulder; Blood of Tyrants; archy; ...

PING in case you missed this article when it was posted, like me. It's an interesting read despite the technical criticisms.

Mulder, I was trying to google Clinton's ban on the sale of surplus ammo when I found this article.

Anybody hear anything about or from archy?


12 posted on 05/29/2004 1:58:43 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

A .50 BMG AP woulndn't penetrate more than about 1 1/4" of steel and then only at close range.


13 posted on 05/29/2004 2:45:18 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
A .50 BMG AP woulndn't penetrate more than about 1 1/4" of steel and then only at close range

I guess I was thinking more of the bucket in the Lethal Weapon movie, which couldn't have been more than 3/4" thick (probably less), rather than the "several inches of hardened steel" that the other poster mentioned.

14 posted on 05/30/2004 11:20:51 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
why didn't he get a gun geek to edit the piece

Dave Kopel *is* a gun geek. In an intellectual sort of way at least:

From the link:

Former Assistant Attorney General, State of Colorado. Hazardous and solid waste enforcement. University of Michigan Law School, J.D. magna cum laude. Contributing Editor, Michigan Law Review. Brown University, B.A. in History with Highest Honors. National Geographic Society Prize for best History thesis. State of Arizona, concealed handgun license instructor. NRA-certified instructor for Pistol and for Personal Protection. NRA-qualified Distinguished Expert rating for Handgun.

Memberships: Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences (Life member), American Civil Liberties Union, American Society of Criminology, National Rifle Association (Benefactor member), National Society of Newspaper Columnists, Outdoor Writers Association of America.

15 posted on 05/30/2004 11:28:36 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
Yawn.
Are they still trying to outlaw my illegal plastique tipped hot loads?
I guess they don't know about all my illegal nuclear tipped hot loads yet?
The ones I fire from my lethal .22 sniper rifle?
But I only ever fire them during the many wedding celebrations I attend in the Middle East! /sarcasm//

Do I hear helicopter rotors...
16 posted on 05/30/2004 11:35:29 PM PDT by sarasmom (Sometimes, I wish liberals had beliefs, so I could desecrate them. (spok))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson