To: Mike Darancette
Wow, a positive poll.
Still only march, though.
To: Mike Darancette
"some other candidate" at 3%. GO, Al, Go!
You can do it!
3 posted on
03/01/2004 8:33:53 AM PST by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Mike Darancette
The KERRY bump is over. The negativity and dearth of ideas will be the end of the French Senator from Vietnam.
4 posted on
03/01/2004 8:37:52 AM PST by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: Mike Darancette
Rasmussen over-inflated Bush's numbers through most of 2000. I wouldn't get giddy over this. And if its anything like 2000, the polls will take wild swings during the coming year, leading one to ask if either the pollsters or the people behind the polls have some other agenda besides taking the nation's pulse (such as trying to sway the electorate or drawing attention to themselves).
Rasmussen and Survey USA seem to be the most pro-Bush pollsters while Quinnipiac (Clinton's favorite pollsters)and Newsweek always seem the most Pro-Dem. But then you toss in Zogby, Gallup and all the alphabet soup networks and you have a consensus that's about as accurate and reliable as the BCS.
6 posted on
03/01/2004 8:39:23 AM PST by
Tall_Texan
((Tagline withheld pending notification of next of kin))
To: Mike Darancette
No, no, no. This can't be correct. Why only this morning on the local news, they said the recent polls show a ticket of Hanoi John and Suehappy Edwards would beat GWB and DC. This poll just has to be wrong.
8 posted on
03/01/2004 8:41:31 AM PST by
RetiredArmy
(We'll put a boot in your ass, it's the American Way! Toby Keith)
To: Mike Darancette
There is something we all must remember. This election will be DIFFERENT from 2000 in this very important regard: Since the 2000 election, the census has shifted electoral college votes FROM the Gore states TO the Bush States. I think at last count the states that Bush carried in 2000 picked up 10 more electoral votes and they all came from Gore states.
If I'm wrong on this, someone please correct me.
10 posted on
03/01/2004 8:48:20 AM PST by
no dems
To: Mike Darancette
kerry has been labeled as the most liberal senator...he is toast...
13 posted on
03/01/2004 8:52:18 AM PST by
metoooo
To: Mike Darancette
I hate seeing that 49% come up so often. I would feel better if 52-53% would start appearing. This is setting up to be a repeat of 2000, where if the Democrats can pull off enough vote fraud, they can steal the election at the wire.
To: Mike Darancette
Nice, but I'm not going to be happy until Bush is over 50 percent. "Don't Knows" and "Undecideds" lean heavily against the incumbent. You can't count on 2 or 3 percent going to Nader (be nice if they did) and you can't count on it going to Nader in the right places.
TS
...
To: Mike Darancette
I'm one of those 49%. I was polled by Rasmussen on Saturday. The results shown today represent Fri., Sat., and Sun. calls.
19 posted on
03/01/2004 10:37:43 AM PST by
jackbill
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson