Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Northeastern Liberal. Kerry and Specter, two peas in a pod.
NRO ^ | March 01, 2004, 9:30 a.m. | By Timothy P. Carney

Posted on 03/01/2004 7:36:39 AM PST by .cnI redruM

The folks at Republican National Committee's research department work pretty hard. They have reams and reams of dirt on the Democratic candidates, including the nominee-apparent John Kerry. One particularly ghoulish portrait they have of the senator from Massachusetts is a list on their website of some of his worst votes.

The RNC website shows that John Kerry has voted to gut the Bush tax cuts, extend "hate crimes" special treatment to homosexuals, keep cloning legal, block tort reform, kill school choice, cut defense spending, oppose parental-notification rules for minors getting abortions and sink the nomination of Judge Robert Bork.

With this catalogue of votes, the RNC makes Kerry look as radical as...well...Arlen Specter.

On all of the above votes, taken from the short list of the lowlights of John Kerry's record, Arlen Specter voted with John Kerry. But the Republican establishment is backing Specter, still.

Of the 26 very worst Kerry votes the RNC could find from 1985 until 2001, Specter voted wrong on 10. Let's take a look at these votes (the descriptions are the from the RNC's "Who is John Kerry?" page):

VS. BORK The Kerry-Specter alliance began with a bang, voting against the Bork nomination. But here, no one can accuse Specter of following Kerry. No, Specter was the point man in sinking Bork. Bork's handler, Tom Korologos, credits Specter with the "game-winning RBI" in sinking the conservative nominee.

Bork's approach to reading the Constitution was too "narrow," and Bork didn't appreciate it as "a living, growing document" in Specter's words. Don't forget this is the man in line to chair the Judiciary Committee next year.

VS. PARENTAL NOTIFICATION

In 1990, Specter joined Kerry in opposing parental notification for minors' abortions. This was not a vote requiring parental consent, merely notification. Not only that, this was not a broad regulation on abortions, it was a condition on federally appropriated money.

Yes, Democrats were sending tax dollars to abortion clinics, and Republicans wanted to add a condition to that money. If an abortionist wanted to abort a minor's unborn child without the parents' knowledge, he could reject the federal funding.

One more detail: the notification rule was waived in the case of "medical emergencies," a broad term which went largely undefined. Still, Kerry and Specter agreed that this was too restrictive. Taxpayer funding for abortionists ought to come with no strings attached, the two concurred.

VS. DEFENSE SPENDING Specter and Kerry were both in the minorities of their respective parties in voting to slash defense spending by $3.1 billion in 1991. Specter was one of three Republicans to support this amendment.

Neither Senator could point to deficit reduction as their rationale-the bill simply shifted the money to domestic federal programs.

VS. SCHOOL CHOICE In January of 1992, Kerry and Specter teamed up on the first two contested votes of the session. First, on a non-binding resolution, they joined in support of Supreme Court rulings banning voluntary prayer in school.

Then, on the fifth roll-call vote of the year, Kerry and Specter helped defeat a pilot program for school choice for poor families only. The provision came with authorization of new funds, and so it could not be accused of draining the public schools.

VS. TORT REFORM Specter and Kerry are two of the favorites of the trial lawyer lobby for a reason. The RNC drew out of Kerry's past a 1995 vote where he and Specter helped defeat a measure that would have capped punitive damages on medical-malpractice and product-liability cases at two times the compensatory damages. This is not a hard cap at all because compensatory damages would not be capped.

On that same day, the two voted hand-in-hand a number of times against the GOP leadership to protect the lawyers.

VS. RESPONSIBLY BUDGETTING This 1997 GOP-sponsored budget resolution combined spending cuts with tax cuts for net deficit reduction. Thirteen other Republicans voted no, but those were the likes of Phil Gramm and Jesse Helms, who objected that the budget was too large. Specter's objections were far closer to those of Kerry.

VS. CLONING BAN Almost precisely five years to the day before scientists first made and killed a human life through cloning, John Kerry and Arlen Specter voted to kill a bill that would have banned human cloning in the U.S.

VS. TAX REDUCTION While they couldn't defeat the $792 billion tax cut on Capitol Hill (during a time of budget surplus in 1999), Kerry and Specter provided enough support to President Clinton to sustain his veto. Specter was one of only two Republicans to join Kerry and the Democrats. Even Jim Jeffords voted Yes.

Specter, of course, changed his tune on tax cuts last year (during a time of budget deficts), when Pat Toomey announced his primary challenge.

VS. EXPANDING HATE-CRIME PROTECTIONS Not only did Kerry and Specter agree in 2000 that crimes against homosexuals or bisexuals should be treated differently than crimes against heterosexuals, they both decided that a defense bill was the appropriate place to push their discriminatory federal power grab.

4 SHRINKING TAX CUT Finally, Specter was one of four Republicans to vote to shrink Bush's tax cut. The amendment passed with 53 votes. Very simply, this means that your taxes are higher now because of liberal Republicans such as Arlen Specter.

George W. Bush thinks he can win Pennsylvania. He seems to think having Arlen Specter on the ticket below him will help. Trying to convince voters to vote for Bush and Specter will be a tough row to hoe, especially when it comes to explaining his positions on taxes, cloning, school choice, the life of the unborn, and the direction of the federal courts. Kerry and Specter would be the more natural pair for voters to choose.

Pennsylvania Republicans have a chance this April 27 to help the Bush campaign in the Keystone State have a clear coherent message on life, the strength of the military, and federal budget.

Otherwise, Bush will need to explain why Kerry's positions the wrong ones for a president to take, but just dandy for a senator.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 2004; kerryrecord; rinohunt; senatorspend; spectre; timothypcarney
We CANNOT allow Arlen Sphincter to chair the Senate Judicial Committee. We are already 50% socialistic as it is. A vote for Toomey, is a vote against paternalistic socialism.
1 posted on 03/01/2004 7:36:41 AM PST by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Second the motion. Specter is a disgrace.
2 posted on 03/01/2004 7:39:33 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
NO MORE RINOS!! VOTE TOOMEY!!
3 posted on 03/01/2004 7:39:54 AM PST by KantianBurke (Principles, not blind loyalty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

Stephen Moore of Club For Growth skewered Arlen a week ago suggesting that he'd be a perfect running mate for Ketchup Boy.  Toomey Operatives are on the street, targeting regular voters and we will be getting out supporters en masse for Primary Day.

Let the RINO HUNT BEGIN!!!

Owl_Eagle

" WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH"

4 posted on 03/01/2004 7:42:48 AM PST by End Times Sentinel (The French have always been there when they needed us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
Sinator Sphincter, The Horse's Arse of The US Senate!
5 posted on 03/01/2004 8:01:55 AM PST by .cnI redruM (!POT EHT OT PMUB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
To be fair, he did vigorously defend Clarence Thomas and he had the stones to attack Anita Hill. Had he not done so, Thomas almost certainly would have been defeated.

I agree that he sank Bork and that he is further Left than many of us would like, but to equate him with Kerry is going too far.
6 posted on 03/01/2004 8:18:19 AM PST by You Dirty Rats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1; dubyaismypresident
arleen ping.
7 posted on 03/01/2004 8:27:51 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
The RNC website shows that John Kerry has voted to gut the Bush tax cuts, extend "hate crimes" special treatment to homosexuals, keep cloning legal, block tort reform, kill school choice, cut defense spending, oppose parental-notification rules for minors getting abortions and sink the nomination of Judge Robert Bork.
With this catalogue of votes, the RNC makes Kerry look as radical as...well...Arlen Specter.

But the Scots like him :^)

8 posted on 03/01/2004 8:30:13 AM PST by NeoCaveman (New and improved is typically neither!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Not Proven.
9 posted on 03/01/2004 8:33:37 AM PST by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Single Bullet.
10 posted on 03/01/2004 8:41:19 AM PST by NeoCaveman (New and improved is typically neither!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Spelling Correction required in title:
Should be "Two Pees in a Pod..."
11 posted on 03/01/2004 9:11:54 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
Or maybe "Two Puds in a Pad."
12 posted on 03/01/2004 9:13:34 AM PST by .cnI redruM (!POT EHT OT PMUB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
To be fair, he did vigorously defend Clarence Thomas and he had the stones to attack Anita Hill. Had he not done so, Thomas almost certainly would have been defeated.

He turns conserative every 6 years, was he up for election at the time?
Jack
13 posted on 03/01/2004 9:51:59 AM PST by btcusn (Giving up the right to arms is a mistake a free people get to make only once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson