But with Kerry on the brink of collecting a majority of delegates to guarantee the Democratic presidential nomination, he does not want to risk trouble with negative campaigning against his sole remaining serious opponent.Or mention this embarassing information about someone who may be his VP?
1 posted on
03/01/2004 1:27:13 AM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
You nailed it, Kat. :)
Off subject, but I take issue with Novak:
Faircloth, a self-made and largely inarticulate businessman
During the hearings into the boxes found in WH which Hillary couldn't tell us how they got there, ole Lauch Faircloth uttered the immortal words " the butler did it."
I MISS Lauch Faircloth. Desperately.
2 posted on
03/01/2004 1:35:41 AM PST by
onyx
(Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Jeffrey Dahmer, and Timothy McVeigh)
To: kattracks
bump
To: kattracks; onyx
Good grief! It's absurd to think this should be a line of attack by the WH at this early date. Where's the PRESS? I know, I know - I used to be 'the press'.
Has anyone asked Johnny if he has any corporations offshore? And what about property in his wife's name? She was a successful attorney until she quit to have the last two kids.
4 posted on
03/01/2004 1:44:47 AM PST by
Fracas
To: kattracks
This is nothing, it is just a Subchapter S corporation it is what it is supposed to do.
ANYONE qualified can set up a subchapter S. This article is futile. sorry folks but I do not see where the "scandal" is. I will not vote for the slime but geeze, this is pushing it.
To: kattracks
oops forgot, the subchaper S was NOT designed for professionals. the PA is for professionals. the Sub S is a seperate issue.
Sub S was set up to avoid the double taxation. IOW under a Sub C, a coropration pays taxes on the profit and then you pay taxes on the income profits when you get them. Taxed twice. With a Sub S. all the profit pass through to the shareholders and they are taxed as income ONCE.
To: kattracks
As usual Novak has not properly researched his facts. Dividends are NOT deductible by corporations for Federal incomes tax purposes. Consequently Edwards would pay personal income taxes on the dividends at a higher rate than the Medicare tax that Novak is railing about, since Sub-Chapter S Corporations "pass through" income to stockholders. I don;t care for Edwards but he has done nothing wrong in this case.
20 posted on
03/01/2004 3:56:02 AM PST by
Shane
To: kattracks
btt
21 posted on
03/01/2004 4:12:39 AM PST by
GailA
(Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
To: kattracks
40 posted on
07/06/2004 7:08:17 PM PDT by
VOA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson