Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/29/2004 1:13:49 AM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: A. Pole; harpseal
ping
2 posted on 02/29/2004 1:14:14 AM PST by sarcasm (Tancredo 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
Senator Charles Schumer wrote recently in the New York Times that free trade had to be reconsidered

It's funny. Free trade and outsourcing threads can go on for a couple hundred replies. It seems like the excerpt above should delineate the issue quite nicely.

4 posted on 02/29/2004 4:12:23 AM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
""When American companies replace domestic employees with lower-cost foreign workers to sell more cheaply in home markets, it seems hard to argue this is the way free trade is supposed to work," Senator Schumer wrote."

Oh my God, I agree with the dirtball. That's not good. This means this issue is far more important than imagined.
13 posted on 02/29/2004 5:03:42 AM PST by Beck_isright ("I did not have sexual relations with that woman" - (Fill in name of Democrat here))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
...a majority of Americans endorsed free trade in principle, even if they believed it was being handled poorly by Washington.

Um...I thought the whole point of "free trade" was to keep the government out of it. So, how can Washington be handling it poorly if it isn't supposed to be handling it at all?

20 posted on 02/29/2004 6:52:45 AM PST by Doohickey ("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
A recent poll by a Washington research group...

And the name of this group is?

24 posted on 02/29/2004 6:56:38 AM PST by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
The University of Maryland's Program on International Policy Attitudes found the percentage of those earning more than $US100,000 who actively supported free trade slid from 57 per cent in 1999 to 28 per cent in January 2004.

Sure, well off Americans were all for destroying blue collar workers and their families so they could buy cheap communist slave labor products at the local Great Wall-Mart.

Now that their cushy jobs are being outsourced to India "free trade" is suddenly not such a good thing!

LOL!

How do you like it SUCKERS?!

You, your skills, your education, work record, experience, are all USELESS in the "free trade" paradise we now live survive in.

The ONLY criteria that matters now is, can you do the same work at a third of the wages or less??

The free traitors have not only destroyed over 2 million middle class American jobs, they may also destroy the Republican party along with them!

31 posted on 02/29/2004 7:34:58 AM PST by Walkin Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
"When American companies replace domestic employees with lower-cost foreign workers to sell more cheaply in home markets, it seems hard to argue this is the way free trade is supposed to work," Senator Schumer wrote.

He's absolutely right. Call it whatever else you want but "free trade" it ain't.

35 posted on 02/29/2004 7:46:27 AM PST by lewislynn (The successful globalist employee will be the best educated, working for the lowest possible wage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: agitator
ping
114 posted on 02/29/2004 1:21:25 PM PST by Scutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
What this thread needs is some babytalk from Sowell so the freetrade hacks can feel good about putting this unpleasantness to bed without straining their brains.
116 posted on 02/29/2004 1:33:17 PM PST by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
The Free Traitors here seem to insist it's a DEMORAT issue. WRONG! It was Conservatives that first squawked and the Dems are smart enough to pick up on it and make it their own. This is a bipartisan issue. The only question is, how many votes Bush will lose to them because of his overwhelming concern for the "international economy." He's lost my vote because of it. He's lost alot of votes because of it. He's just one more corporate sellout unconcerned with his nation and the people in it. This ain't a boardroom, Jorge. And we're not buying your lame excuses. Think again. I'm voting Constitution Party.
172 posted on 02/29/2004 8:45:02 PM PST by ETERNAL WARMING (SHUT THE DOOR IN 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
All I gotta say is this:

DOH!

182 posted on 03/01/2004 5:51:57 AM PST by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson