Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran can produce nuke warhead in days
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | February 28, 2004 | Bill Gertz

Posted on 02/28/2004 6:30:30 PM PST by RickofEssex

Iran can produce nuke warhead in days Cleric-led regime covertly developed uranium enrichment facilities

Iran has secretly developed its uranium enrichment facilities in Natanz, which is now considered the linchpin of the nation's nuclear weapons program, reports Geostrategy-Direct, the global intelligence news service.

U.S. officials said that Iran transferred research, development and assembly operations to Natanz in an effort to transform the site into the main facility for the Iranian gas centrifuge program.

Iran has ambitious plans for Natanz. Currently, the site includes centrifuge assembly areas and a pilot fuel-enrichment plant slated to hold 1,000 centrifuges. A production-scale fuel-enrichment plant is being constructed at Natanz to house some 50,000 centrifuges.

Iran has designed its nuclear weapons program so that it could produce enough enriched uranium to construct a warhead within days, official says.

"Natanz could be operated to make low-enriched uranium fuel until Iran decided it wanted to make weapon-grade material," David Albright and Corey Hinderstein write in the March/April 2004 issue of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

"It wouldn't take long to enrich the low-enriched material to weapon grade. For example, if Natanz was operating at full capacity and recycled the end product – low-enriched uranium [5 percent uranium-235] – back into the feed point, the facility could produce enough weapon-grade uranium for a single weapon within days."

Officials said Iran possesses blueprints for the construction of the advanced P2 gas centrifuge, which can enrich bomb-quality uranium in half the time of first-generation Pakistani-origin centrifuges. Iran has acknowledged possessing hundreds of P1 machines at Natanz. The International Atomic Energy Agency board of governors is scheduled to meet March 8-10 in Vienna to discuss the issue.

U.S. officials and analysts have assessed that the Iranian nuclear facilities the IAEA inspected are part of an infrastructure designed to produce up to 30 nuclear weapons annually.

The Iranian nuclear infrastructure includes both open and closed facilities, such as the Bushehr nuclear reactor, the Natanz uranium enrichment plant, the Kalaye facility and the Arak heavy water plant.

Despite Iran's pledge to the IAEA, Teheran has continued to conceal its nuclear weapons program, including designs for the enrichment of uranium as well as experiments with polonium, an element that facilitates the chain reaction that produces a nuclear explosion, officials said.

"There's no doubt in our mind that Iran continues to pursue a nuclear weapons program," U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage said.

"They have not been fully forthcoming with their arrangement with the IAEA and we need to continue our effort, along with our European friends, to gain compliance."

U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton said: "The information that the IAEA has learned is certainly consistent with the information that we had, and it's not surprising. It's another act of Iranian deception and not something that leads to any feeling of security, that they are carrying through on their commitment to suspend enrichment activity."

Albright, president of the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security, said that prior to Iran's suspension of uranium enrichment in November 2003, Teheran was conducting both single machine tests and small cascades with uranium hexafluoride at the pilot plant.

Iran was assembling four-rotor machines similar to the P1 design, each with a capacity of roughly three separative work units [swu] per year, he said.

Albright and Hinderstein, a senior researcher at the institute, said the pilot plant at Natanz could produce about 10 kilograms of weapon-grade uranium a year. This would be far less than the amount of enriched uranium required to provide fuel for all of the civilian power plants Iran intends to build over the next 20 years.

"Alternatively, the same capacity could be used to produce roughly 500 kilograms of weapon-grade uranium annually," Albright and Hinderstein wrote. "At 15-20 kilograms per weapon, that would be enough for 25-30 nuclear weapons per year."

Albright said U.S. and other intelligence agencies knew of Pakistan's contribution to Iran's nuclear weapons program as early as a decade ago. But the agencies were hampered by a lack of knowledge of Iran's nuclear program, particularly whether it was succeeding in procuring vital components.

By the mid-1990s, Iran had succeeded in concealing its procurement of critical centrifuge components from U.S. intelligence agencies. Albright said U.S. intelligence estimates regarding the time Iran needed to build a pilot centrifuge plant proved to be reasonably accurate.

"After the mid-1990s, according to former senior U.S. government officials, U.S. intelligence agencies learned little concrete about Iran's centrifuge progress," Albright said. "As a result, there was little concerted action until 2002 to stop Iran's secret centrifuge program or demand far more intrusive IAEA inspections in Iran. From 1995 until 2002, Iran moved relatively freely and secretly toward building a domestic centrifuge industry that could enrich significant quantities of uranium."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: billgertz; iran; mrnu; proliferation; southasia

1 posted on 02/28/2004 6:30:30 PM PST by RickofEssex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RickofEssex
Russia supplied uranium, evidence suggests

WASHINGTON -- Inspectors have found evidence that some of the highly enriched uranium found on nuclear processing machines that Iran acquired from Pakistan was obtained from black market sources in Russia, European diplomats and American experts said Friday.

With the findings, Russia emerges as a new and unexpected source of supply to Iran's nuclear efforts, though experts were careful to specify that the uranium was not exported with Moscow's blessings.

The Bush administration has long accused Iran of harboring a secret bomb project, which Tehran denies, saying its nuclear program is only for peacetime purposes.

Last year's discovery of highly enriched uranium in Iran sparked an international crisis about the country's nuclear intentions and raised questions about where it had originated.

On Friday, European diplomats said an International Atomic Energy Agency's laboratory in Austria had discovered a likely match between the atomic signatures of Russian uranium and samples gathered from Iranian centrifuges.

2 posted on 02/28/2004 6:32:33 PM PST by RickofEssex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RickofEssex
Gives me the Warm and Fuzzies.....
3 posted on 02/28/2004 6:36:31 PM PST by cmsgop ( HAS ANYONE SEEN Spalding Grey ??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RickofEssex
Do I hear the sound of Isreal jets being warmed up?
4 posted on 02/28/2004 6:38:40 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
Well they do have those fancy new F16's...field test coming up?
5 posted on 02/28/2004 7:25:14 PM PST by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RickofEssex
Target.
6 posted on 02/28/2004 7:44:51 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (MEMRI, Lights the Corners of Their Minds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RickofEssex
A nuking we will go,

A nuking we will go,

Heigh ho, the merry O
A nuking we shall go.
7 posted on 02/28/2004 7:58:16 PM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RickofEssex
Are you sure that Bill Gertz is the author?

This is important since Bill Gertz is a reliable source and Geostrategy-Direct is not.

8 posted on 02/28/2004 8:13:48 PM PST by mvonfr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RickofEssex
When the hell do we start bombing?
9 posted on 02/28/2004 10:56:51 PM PST by rogueleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RickofEssex
WE NEED A REGIME CHANGE IN IRAN
10 posted on 02/28/2004 11:32:44 PM PST by F14 Pilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RickofEssex
We have to remember that this is the legacy of JIMMY CARTER.

"Carter also chastised the Shah of Iran for his human rights record and withdrew American support. This led to the U.S. losing a priceless pro-Western ally in the Middle East – an ally that was replaced by the deranged anti-Western Islamic theocracy of the Ayatollah Khomeini.

Khomeini killed more innocent Iranians (20,000) in a two-week reign of terror than the Shah could have even dreamed of killing throughout his 38 years in power (1941-1979).

Thanks to Carter, Iran’s pro-Western disposition was terminated and the rights that had been won for women in that country were reversed. Moreover, it was precisely because of the Iranian revolution that the Iran-Iraq war broke out – a war that took one million lives over its eight-year duration.

The Iran-Iraq nightmare led to the chaos in that region that yielded Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait, which, in turn, led to the American war effort to get Iraq out of Kuwait. That necessary war effort, as we know, triggered an Islamic hatred of America that played a significant role in 9/11.

Let us also keep in mind that the Islamic revolution in Iran gave inspiration to tens of thousands of Islamic fanatics, who now began to conspire ever more fervently to destroy modernity in their own societies and to instigate terror against America and the West."

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=183

11 posted on 02/29/2004 9:27:22 AM PST by FairOpinion ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country." --- G. W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RickofEssex
Bush has to keep cleaning up the DANGEROUS mess left by Clinton and Carter.

God help us, if Kerry gets elected!
12 posted on 02/29/2004 9:28:24 AM PST by FairOpinion ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country." --- G. W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RickofEssex
And what enemy does Iran have, pray tell, that so threatens it as to necessitate its developing nuclear weapons?

Hmmm??

Pakistan can at least point to India... but who's threatening Iran in such a dire fashion that it needs a nuclear weapons program?

Hmmmmm???

13 posted on 02/29/2004 11:56:13 PM PST by fire_eye (These rug pilots all look the same through an ACOG.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson