Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S., Pakistan Deny Bin Laden Was Captured
Associated Press/Bellsouth.net News ^ | 2/28/2004 | Staff

Posted on 02/28/2004 7:17:27 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - Pentagon and Pakistani officials on Saturday denied an Iranian state radio report that Osama bin Laden was captured in Pakistan's border region with Afghanistan "a long time ago."

The claim came at a time when Pakistan's army was hunting al-Qaida suspects in a remote tribal region along the border with Afghanistan, believed to be a possible hiding place for the al-Qaida leader.

The report was carried by Iran radio's external Pashtun service, which is designed for listeners in Afghanistan and Pakistan where the language is widely spoken.

Iran state radio's main news channel - the Farsi-language service for Iranian listeners - did not carry the bin Laden report. Iran state television also did not carry the report.

The director of Iran radio's Pashtun service, Asheq Hossein, said he had two sources for the report. The radio quoted its reporter as saying bin Laden had been in custody for a period of time, but a U.S. announcement of the capture was being withheld by President Bush until closer to the November election.

"Osama bin Laden has been arrested a long time ago, but Bush is intending to use it for propaganda maneuvering in the presidential election," he said.

There have been reports that military forces believed they had identified bin Laden's general location and had him encircled, but Pakistani officials have denied any specific knowledge of bin Laden's whereabouts.

The state radio report, quoting an unnamed source, said U.S. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's visit to the region this week was in connection with the arrest.

Larry Di Rita, the chief Pentagon spokesman who traveled with Rumsfeld this week to Afghanistan, denied the report. "I don't have any reason to think it's true," he said Saturday.

Lt. Col. Bryan Hilferty, a spokesman for the U.S. military in Afghanistan, also said he had no information to suggest bin Laden had been caught.

"Things are going well, and we believe we will eventually catch all the leaders of al-Qaida, but I know nothing of that report," he said.

Pakistani Information Minister Sheikh Rashid Ahmed denied the reported capture, saying it was "baseless news."

"We have neither arrested Osama nor we have any information about him," Ahmed told The Associated Press.

Pakistani Army spokesman Gen. Shaukat Sultan also told The Associated Press that the report was not true. "That information is wrong," he said.

A Pakistani official said previously that members of al-Qaida are being sought in the border region, although bin laden was not a specific target.

Speaking to the AP in Tehran, Hossein identified one of the sources for the bin Laden report as Shamim Shahed, editor of the English-language Pakistani newspaper The Nation in Peshawar. Hossein said Shahed told him Friday night that bin Laden was arrested "a long time ago."

But Shahed, who is The Nation's Peshawar bureau chief and not its editor, denied telling Iranian radio that bin Laden had been captured.

"I never said this," Shahed said in a telephone interview with the AP's Islamabad bureau. "But I have for the last year been saying that he is not far away. He is within their (the Americans') reach, and they can declare him arrested any time."

"I have been misquoted. On this matter, we never talked, the last two months. I'm angry, because they've misquoted me," Shahed said in a separate interview with AP Radio.

Hossein said he had a second source for his report that bin Laden had been captured, but he declined to identify him except to say he was "a man with close links to intelligence services and Afghan tribal leaders."

The report was carried by Iran radio's external Pashtun service, which is designed for listeners in Afghanistan and Pakistan where the language is widely spoken.

Iran state radio's main news channel - the Farsi-language service for Iranian listeners - did not carry the bin Laden report. Iran state television also did not carry the report.

Separately, Pakistani forces killed 11 people in an exchange of fire Saturday after a minibus failed to stop at a roadblock in a tribal region where the ongoing anti-terrorism operations have been taking place, an army spokesman told the AP. The shooting occurred a day after armed men and soldiers exchanged fire at a military compound in the region.

The Iranian news agency IRNA was first to report the capture of ousted Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. IRNA also carried the state radio report about bin Laden's capture and said it had contacted a radio announcer at the Pashtun service who confirmed the news.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: binladen; bushelection; captured; denial; obl; southasia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 02/28/2004 7:17:27 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
"The radio quoted its reporter as saying bin Laden had been in custody for a period of time, but a U.S. announcement of the capture was being withheld by President Bush until closer to the November election."

This has Terry McAuliffe written all over it.

2 posted on 02/28/2004 7:18:38 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1087281/posts?page=29#29
3 posted on 02/28/2004 7:20:36 AM PST by ASA Vet ("Anyone who signed up after 11/28/97 is a newbie")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
"I told you so!"


4 posted on 02/28/2004 7:26:20 AM PST by ErnBatavia (Gay marriage is for suckers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
If you meant to point to the fact that the story was already posted, I can't search within the actual posts on a thread.
5 posted on 02/28/2004 7:27:44 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
These are not strong denials. Hope rises.
6 posted on 02/28/2004 7:29:41 AM PST by Thebaddog (Woof this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
My apologies. I screwed up the link.
I didn't intend to link to a post within the thread, but to the thread itself.
7 posted on 02/28/2004 7:30:41 AM PST by ASA Vet ("Anyone who signed up after 11/28/97 is a newbie")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Actually, the "captured in time for the election" is not a bad story when you consider it's other aspects. It would also mean that OBL has been our honored guest at a government owned and operated facility in a garden spot like Diego Garcia, Gitmo and so on.

During his delightful stay, he would have been served by a professional staff of, oh, CIA folks who have tended his every need. His health issues would have been monitored by US doctors and he would have been given the very latest in mediacl attention including, probably, some new experimental drugs. Six months of cozy chats without interference from his Saudi masters might have been informative.

Election surprise or not, the dem crap weasels are going to whine no matter when we get him. And, if we don't have him on election eve, you know they'll whine about that.

8 posted on 02/28/2004 7:35:14 AM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
>And, if we don't have him on election eve, you know they'll whine about that.

Maybe Osama
will surrender himself to,
say, Jesse Jackson . . .

(Or Johnnie Cochran
or Kerry or Hillary
or, maybe, Chomsky . . .)

9 posted on 02/28/2004 7:41:04 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
"I don't have any reason to think it's true,"

No reason to "think" it's true if he "knows" it's true.

"Things are going well, and we believe we will eventually catch all the leaders of al-Qaida, but I know nothing of that report,"

This one knows nothing "personally" of the report but perhaps knows something about what "others" have said about the report.

"We have neither arrested Osama nor we have any information about him,"

"We" don't but "they" do.

I don't know that these statements are parsed, but they certainly could be.
10 posted on 02/28/2004 8:48:45 AM PST by jonboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
I wonder if Osama would be considered such a martyr if we gave him a sex-change operation, and insisted that's the way we found him!
11 posted on 02/28/2004 9:16:02 AM PST by Solamente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
I think I saw that some middle level guy was caught this week in Pakistan who had recently been traveling with Al Zawahiri. That's probably where the initial confusion came from, I bet.
12 posted on 02/28/2004 9:59:58 AM PST by OneTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Luis, this is sure to drive the DU'ers and the DNC off on a feeding frenzy.
13 posted on 02/28/2004 10:04:16 AM PST by ClintonBeGone (John Kerry is the Democrat's Bob Dole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Considering the track record of govts, this denial is almost proof postive we do have him.
14 posted on 02/28/2004 10:18:45 AM PST by swarthyguy (You have to remember that if you grow thorns, you will not harvest roses - Ayman Al-Zawahiri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez; ASA Vet; ErnBatavia; Thebaddog; Tacis; theFIRMbss; jonboy; Solamente; ...
I agree, it's a DNC dirty trick, a la the "October Surprise" lie from those lying liars who lie. The "October Surprise" backfired, however, because no one gave it any credence. Any credibility that it may have begun with fell apart rather quickly; the whole fake story appears as gospel on the paranoid websites around the world.

And if we do give credence to this new Iranian claim, we'll also have to give credence to this:
Iranian News Agency Alleges Presidential Candidate John Kerry Sends Email Message
According to an article published in the Tehran Times, the office of U.S. Senator and leading Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry sent an email message to the Mehr News Agency. The following is the article as it appeared in English : [1]

"The office of Senator John Kerry, the frontrunner in the Democratic presidential primary in the U.S., sent the Mehr News Agency an email saying that Kerry will try to repair the damage done by the incumbent president if he wins the election. The text of the e-mail follows:

"'As Americans who have lived and worked extensively overseas, we have personally witnessed the high regard with which people around the world have historically viewed the United States. Sadly, we are also painfully aware of how the actions and the attitudes demonstrated by the U.S. government over the past three years have threatened the goodwill earned by presidents of both parties over many decades and put many of our international relationships at risk.

"'It is in the urgent interests of the people of the United States to restore our country's credibility in the eyes of the world. America needs the kind of leadership that will repair alliances with countries on every continent that have been so damaged in the past few years, as well as build new friendships and overcome tensions with others.

"'We are convinced that John Kerry is the candidate best qualified to meet this challenge. Senator Kerry has the diplomatic skill and temperament as well as a lifetime of accomplishments in [the] field of international affairs. He believes that collaboration with other countries is crucial to efforts to win the war on terror and make America safer.

"'An understanding of global affairs is essential in these times, and central to this campaign. Kerry has the experience and the understanding necessary to successfully restore the United States to its position of respect within the community of nations. He has the judgment and vision necessary to assure that the United States fulfills a leadership role in meeting the challenges we face throughout the world.

"'The current Administration's policies of unilateralism and rejection of important international initiatives, from the Kyoto Accords to the Biological Weapons Convention, have alienated much of the world and squandered remarkable reserves of support after 9/11. This climate of hostility affects us all, but most especially impacts those who reside overseas. Disappointment with current U.S. leadership is widespread, extending not just to the corridors of power and politics, but to the man and woman on the street as well.

"'We believe John Kerry is the Democrat who can go toe-to-toe against the current Administration on national security and defense issues. We also remain convinced that John Kerry has the best chance of beating the incumbent in November, and putting America on a new course that will lead to a safer, more secure, and more stable world.'"

15 posted on 02/28/2004 12:44:30 PM PST by SunkenCiv (*** The left isn't cognitively closed, because it isn't cognitive in the first place! ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
People in this forum advocate a Kerry presidency, arguing that it is the only fiscally responsible thing to do.
16 posted on 02/28/2004 12:47:12 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Oh yeah, this place is a hotbed of Kerry support. :'D
17 posted on 02/28/2004 1:07:32 PM PST by SunkenCiv (*** The left isn't cognitively closed, because it isn't cognitive in the first place! ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
The idea that a Kerry win would be a good thing was widely promoted here by FReepers calling themselves conservatives, it was about controlling expenditures.

Then Jim cleaned up the site.

You may have missed it due to the fact that you've only been a member for slightly less than two months.
18 posted on 02/28/2004 1:12:26 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Denied he was captured a long time ago? Have they denied he was captured recently?
19 posted on 02/28/2004 1:13:29 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Nope.
20 posted on 02/28/2004 1:15:04 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson