Skip to comments.
Senator Hillary! Women better off with Saddam - Transcript (long, know thy enemy)
Brookings Institution ^
| 2-27-04
Posted on 02/27/2004 7:30:51 PM PST by Indy Pendance
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
To: LADY J
She and the other democrats funnel all that information to our enemies, their allies , as soon as they get it.
They pass it on so fast that it is almost in real time.
21
posted on
02/27/2004 8:09:31 PM PST
by
sport
To: LADY J; FairOpinion
"First, the idea of winning hearts and minds has been derided by some.
But I don't think that we can overlook it's single importance. And we need to do more to combat the influence of hatred and bias and, for example, I think, with respect to education, we are doing far too little around the world.
I met, coming out of Afghanistan at midnight with President Musharraf and Senator Reed and I discussed a number of issues, one of which was his recently announced effort to deal with the proliferation of the Madrassas, which, obviously, we know is the only alternative for many young boys to attend school because of the poverty of their families and the failure to provide an educational establishment throughout the country.
We need to provide more help than we currently are doing. We spend a pittance on global education, about $200 million a year. I would like to see us focus on creating a global education fund that the United States would lead, but which would use contributions from other countries around the world. I'd like to see us expand that to $500 million and to make a very serious effort to spread real education to provide a replacement for the indoctrination that too often serves as a training ground for future terrorists. "
Lot's of talk of globalization. Some think the Republicans are spending a lot, and I agree, but after 70+ years of democrat control, imagine what we'd be spending under her? Our government process takes a long time, done on purpose, thank goodness our founding fathers thought of that, and spending will get under control once the social programs are reduced and hopefully eliminated. But too many have become dependent on the government. With attrition, our children will see less and less. We won't be able to reduce it overnight, but with time, and with a stronger republican and more conservative control, we can achieve it. We just have to keep pushing, not give up, because if we do, these things she espouses are our future.
To: FreeReign
But I strongly disagree with the Administration's approach towards the Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. This is the kind of international cooperation that we should be supporting not turning away from.
And the Bush Administration is cutting back on the U. S. contribution to the Global AIDS Fund by about 64 percent in the new budget, despite its pledge to cooperate and collaborate on a strategy to deal with these three killers.
Congress allocated $547 million for the Fund in 2004, the Administration's 2005 budget calls for $200 million. This, again, is a perfect example of the go-it-alone approach. And while we are recognizing problems through our new AIDS Initiative that the Administration is announcing, in 14 countries, we're, you know, setting up a parallel program, duplicating efforts, reinventing the wheel, not only with respect to what other governments are doing, but NGOs that have gotten into those countries.
Then there's more spending, and more globalization. If this woman ever becomes president, she'll be known as the modern day
Romulus Augustulus.
To: FairOpinion
That sequence of diplomatic retrenchments sent a clear message: We're going it alone, whether you like it or not. In fact, we hope you don't like it, because that will make us feel even stronger as we pursue our objectives around the world.We do not trust international efforts to deal with common problems. We are better served by freedom of action, rather than collective action.
Marxism, socialism, collectivism, whatever you want to call it. Check her contemptuous profile of Bush Administration policy..."we hope you don't like it because that will make us feel stronger." And then she calls for collective action, deriding personal action.
This is the window to the soul of this woman's politics.
24
posted on
02/27/2004 8:44:24 PM PST
by
Dolphy
To: Indy Pendance
He was an equal opportunity oppressor, but on paper women had rightsYeah, just like citizens of the Soviet Union had "rights" in the Constitution of the USSR. When will liberals learn that words on pieces of paper are meaningless without the will and the power to enforce them?
To: Indy Pendance
Why doesn't she move to Iraq and front the movement?
26
posted on
02/27/2004 8:50:29 PM PST
by
mrobison
(We are the music makers and we are the dreamers of dreams.)
To: Indy Pendance
27
posted on
02/27/2004 8:53:40 PM PST
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com)
To: Indy Pendance
Who needs a humor break? Hit "Ctrl F," type "you know" and then start hitting your Enter key.
I can just hear it. What a horrible speaker she is. Just looking at her words made me hear her voice, which made me vomit.
28
posted on
02/27/2004 8:54:50 PM PST
by
bluefish
To: bluefish
THAT was the worst part about reading this, only I saw her face. I turn off the television, or turn the radio volume down when I see or hear Mr. or Mrs. i42.
To: Indy Pendance
Now,
in order to work more cooperatively with other nations to prevent the proliferation, we have to be cautious about our own development and deployment of WMDs so we don't send mixed signals about our intentions and undermine our ability to reach agreements with other nations or unintentionally escalate an arms race with nations that might perceive out actions as provocative.
Specifically, I'm talking about the Administration's new strategic triad.
It's potential development of a new nuclear battlefield device and its plan to contract the current testing schedule for nuclear weapons from three years down to 18 months.
You know the Triad, which includes a strategic nuclear offense capability, a missile defense system, and long-range precision conventional capability, blurs the line between nuclear and conventional weapons systems, making others less certain about our intentions and, perhaps, frankly, making it easier for others to cross the line from conventional to nuclear.
Always looking out for the rest of the world , at our expense,, how clintonesque. We are the evil ones yaknow and risk further alienating other nations developing WMDs.
Huh? Like we really want to have to use a nuclear penetrator device.
Maybe , we could test it on ol' Crusty's drawers. As rumor has it, nothing has penetrated them in years.
30
posted on
02/27/2004 9:06:43 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi Mac ... Support Our Troops! ... NO NO NO NO on Props 55-58)
To: NormsRevenge
That's not the rumor I heard. Wasn't she in California recently? Things that make you go, hhhhmmmmmmmm...
To: Paul Atreides
Paul Atreides: America Better Off Without Hillary To crib from WSJ:
"What would we do without Paul Atreides?"
32
posted on
02/27/2004 9:28:48 PM PST
by
LibertarianInExile
(What will we do with the drunken sailor? Depends--is the drunken sailor an affirmative action hire?)
To: Indy Pendance
So, for hillary, all that has to be said is that a person has rights, it doesn't actually have to be reality. weird gal.
To: Indy Pendance
INTREP - THE EVIL ONE - Klintoon
To: AgThorn
In the late 1700's and all through the 1800's Women in this country had very little say if any at all.
What needs to happen is that, a Constitution needs to be written that is grounded in basic human rights and law, a Constitution that clearly explains the need for a separation of powers that are equally divided between Justice, Judiciary and Executive branches and let them set their own course. Help them with elections and the frame work that will allow them to take control and govern themselves
35
posted on
02/27/2004 10:16:00 PM PST
by
MJY1288
(There's no leaders on the path of least resistance, ask John Kerry, he's been paving it for 32 yrs.)
To: gov_bean_ counter
Hillary desperately needs a decent speech writer who grasps basic writing rules and who can organize thoughts in some coherent fashion:
Introduction - states the thesis
Body - argument, analysis, and support for thesis
Conclusion - summary and conclusions
Hillary rambles. Hard to believe she is a Yale law grad.
36
posted on
02/27/2004 10:24:03 PM PST
by
Spotsy
To: Indy Pendance
you know, a bump to look up how, you know, much the clinton adm. contributions were -, you know, tomorrow!
you know, blah blah!
37
posted on
02/27/2004 11:32:41 PM PST
by
malia
(BUSH & CHENEY 2004)
To: Indy Pendance
Dear Lord:
I know I'm not a perfect man by any stretch, and I have little right to ask this of you. But, when the Day of Reckoning comes, and this demonic, cloven-hooved beast must answer to you, can I watch?
Just Wondering,
Viking2002
38
posted on
02/27/2004 11:40:44 PM PST
by
Viking2002
(I think; therefore, I Freep............)
To: Paul Atreides
Wow! I'll drink to that .. and I don't even drink!
39
posted on
02/28/2004 12:18:49 AM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: Indy Pendance
Please God, deliver us from this wicked woman. Please
Red
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson