Posted on 02/27/2004 2:18:47 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
Hmm... well of course there is the executive order to, um . .
Oh, oh well cetainly. The E.O. for gays in the military . . erp . . . no.
Dang! I'm stumped.
Was there one?
fyi ...
I hadn't heard anything about this until now ...
Other's might question Kucinich's veracity. 8^O
"If the human race as a whole, rather than 50 states plus the District of Colombia, could cast a ballot this coming November, John Kerry would surely win the presidency by a landslide."Unfortunately for President Bush-haters around the world, only the 200 million United States citizens of voting age will have that right - and the outcome is anything but sure."
We are not allowed to post the Independent's articles on FR - I tried - but I thought all should be reminded of the Leftist Mindset concerning our democratic elections, our nation's sovereignty, and our Constitutional Republic. They are One-Worlders to a man. John Kerry is currently their American representative, and he voted for this LOST way of allowing the UN to tax American citizens, to control our military maneuvers, and to tell us what we can and can not do in international waters.
Says Frank J. Gaffney Jr.:
"The bottom line is that the Law of the Sea is a prime example of the way people like Sen. Kerry would like the world to be ordered and run. It is not consistent with Republican governing principles and values — or, more importantly, this country's vital interests."
Speaking of Law of the Sea, Kerry's Kerry ancestors "came over" to America on the ship Koenigin Luise in "First Class."
"Says Frank J. Gaffney Jr.:
"The bottom line is that the Law of the Sea is a prime example of the way people like Sen. Kerry would like the world to be ordered and run. It is not consistent with Republican governing principles and values — or, more importantly, this country's vital interests."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
At what point will U.N. "Law" overtake U.S. Law?
Is it even possible, or being contemplated by those in our own government to merge our national authority into that of the U.N. with the U.N. taking precedence?
Is this all just a Conspiracy theory or pipe dream of a few wacky militant rednecks?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"They are One-Worlders to a man. John Kerry is currently their American representative, and he voted for this LOST way of allowing the UN to tax American citizens, to control our military maneuvers, and to tell us what we can and can not do in international waters."
The United Nations Wants to TAX you!
"Secretary General Boutros Boutros-Ghali ... urged the [UN] to consider imposing its own taxes to become less dependent on the United States...."
-Washington Times, January 16, 1996
Are you concerned that...
...numerous taxation schemes to finance the UN are being considered?
Economist James Tobin proposed in 1972 that the UN be the recipient of a tax of 0.05% on foreign exchange transactions. In 1993, the Ford Foundation produced Financing an Effective United Nations, a report containing recommendations that the UN tax airline traffic, shipping, and arms sales. In 1995, the UN-funded Commission on Global Governance suggested that the UN collect levies from those who use "flight lanes, sea lanes for ships, ocean fishing areas, and the electromagnetic spectrum." Ultimately, of course, the burden of all taxation falls on consumers.
Are you concerned that...
...a State Department study specifically proposed giving the UN taxing power and, ultimately, control of the world?
In 1962, the State Department financed a study entitled "A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations." The report outlined what would be needed for such a total world government: "a mandatory universal membership," an ability to use "physical force," and "compulsory jurisdiction" of its courts. One of the UN's "principle features," stated the report, would be "enforceable taxing powers." (Emphasis added.)
Are you concerned that...
...no matter how much our nation gives, the UN will never be satisfied?
In addition to hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars in foreign aid, our nation has provided the UN with tens of billions more for its programs since 1945. Currently, U.S. contributions make up 25% of the UN's annual budget. But, in his May 2001 speech at Notre Dame University, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan complained with a typical anit-American attitude, "It is shameful that the United States ... should be one of the least generous in terms of helping the world's poor."
Are you concerned that...
...taxing authority would fuel an unaccountable UN Superstate?
Former UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali said of a UN tax: "We would no be under the daily financial will of member states who are unwilling to pay up." UN Founder Harlan Cleveland made the same point in Futures: Rather than relying on "the worn-out policy of year-to-year decisions by individual governments" (about how much to give the UN), "what's needed is a flow of funds for development which are generated automatically under international control." And there would be no Congress to limit the UN's appetite for your tax dollars!
The United Nations Wants to Take Your Land!
"Private land ownership ... contributes to social injustice.... Public control of land use is therefore indispensable."
- United Nations "Habitat I" Conference Report, 1976
- United Nations "Habitat I" Conference Report, 1976
I wonder, would that explain, at least in part, why the UN stands aside while farmers in Zimbabwe and Namibia are stripped of their property and the land awarded to "the poor". (Under state control of course.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
