Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. to Stop Using 'Persistent' Landmines After 2010
American Forces Press Service ^ | Feb. 27, 2004 | By Gerry J. Gilmore

Posted on 02/27/2004 12:59:42 PM PST by Calpernia

The U.S. military will stop using always-armed, live landmines after 2010 under a new government policy announced by senior officials at a State Department news briefing today.

The United States will become "the first major military power to adopt a policy ending use of all persistent landmines and maintaining the international standard of detect ability for landmines of any kind," said Lincoln Bloomfield, assistant secretary of state for political-military affairs.

American military de-miners, as well as those from other nations, Bloomfield said, already are involved in marking, monitoring and clearing live minefields left at the end of hostilities in at least 40 countries.

Each year thousands of people fall victim to live landmines buried around the world, Bloomfield said. U.S. forces, he pointed out, didn't leave those mines behind -- except for the potential exception of landmines remaining after the Vietnam conflict from three decades ago.

"The worldwide humanitarian (landmine) crisis is very much the product of persistent landmines used by other militaries or non-state actors who did not observe the international conventions relating to the use of these munitions," Bloomfield said.

Future American military use of landmines engineered to self-deactivate after a specific period of time should save civilian lives without taking away a key defensive weapon, he noted.

Bloomfield said the new policy doesn't impact on old-style contact landmines used on the Korean Peninsula to deter possible North Korean aggression against South Korea.

Joseph Collins, deputy assistant secretary of defense for stability operations, also at the briefing, said the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff and the military services were involved participants in the development of the new landmine policy.

The new policy requires DoD to develop and use more sophisticated, civilian- friendly landmines in the future, Collins said, noting that landmines would remain an important component of the U.S. military's weapons inventory.

Landmines are employed as force-multipliers, Collins explained, "allowing us to fight and win with fewer forces … against numerically superior opponents," while protecting American troops.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2010; bloomfield; governmentpolicy; landmines; statedepartment

1 posted on 02/27/2004 12:59:42 PM PST by Calpernia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MJY1288; Calpernia; Grampa Dave; anniegetyourgun; Ernest_at_the_Beach; BOBTHENAILER; Jessamine; ...
The new policy requires DoD to develop and use more sophisticated, civilian- friendly landmines in the future, Collins said, noting that landmines would remain an important component of the U.S. military's weapons inventory.

Private Mail to be added to or removed from the GNFI (or Pro-Coalition) ping list.

2 posted on 02/27/2004 1:00:46 PM PST by Calpernia (http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
And it is all George Bush's fault!!
3 posted on 02/27/2004 1:00:55 PM PST by PISANO (Our troops...... will NOT tire...will NOT falter.....and WILL NOT FAIL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
I like the idea of landmines disabling themselves after certain period. Too many innocent kids getting maimed 2,3,5...10 years after the fact. Ain't right.

Nor is it right to ban landmines. Intentionally making yorself more vulnerable is stupid. Landmines are a fact of life. You can't put toothpaste back in the tube.
4 posted on 02/27/2004 1:16:21 PM PST by SolutionsOnly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolutionsOnly; Poohbah; section9; BOBTHENAILER; Dog
The problem is, only good guys will follow any land mine treaty.

The bad guys never follow agreements. In addition, the guy pushing this hardest in Congress is Pat Leahy, who never served, much less saw combat. And he thinks he knows better than folks who have put in decades of service?

WTF?
5 posted on 02/27/2004 1:20:04 PM PST by hchutch ("I never get involved with my own life. It's too much trouble." - Michael Garibaldi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
I agree. The 'ban landmines' camp are the same folks who wanted us to unilaterally dismantle or nuclear arsenal in the 70's - You know, the John Kerry crowd.

And sorry, but not even decades of service could instill an ounce of common sense in Patrick Leahy.
6 posted on 02/27/2004 1:28:53 PM PST by SolutionsOnly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SolutionsOnly
What will be in them to time them out. If something electronic, then a suitable EMP would also suffice to disable the mines.
7 posted on 02/27/2004 1:40:12 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
I'm sure they could radio activate/deactive them or something.

Actually, they're probably way ahed of us on this. They probably exist already. Wouldn't surprise me.
8 posted on 02/27/2004 1:43:39 PM PST by SolutionsOnly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Bump!
9 posted on 02/27/2004 7:36:25 PM PST by windchime (Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson