[bluerose]

Love him or hate him I think he hit the nail on the head with this article.

[over3Owithabrain]

Yes he did. Funny how conservatives like Pryor stood up for the law even when he personally disagreed with it. But liberals (including Ah-nold), conveniently ignore illegal gay marriages.

[bobo1]

Exposing hypocrisy from the left is like taking candy from a baby.

You just don't know where to start.

Blessings, Bobo

[cake_crumb]

"Love him or hate him I think he hit the nail on the head with this article"

Agreed. I'm nowhere close to being a fan of his, but he got where he is today because when he's right he's right. And eloquent.

[Exeter]

I'm waiting for the mayor of some small Utah community to declare that the ban against pologamy is unconstitutional and starts handing out marriage licenses to multiple wedding parties. Let's see what these protectors of the 1st Amendment will say then...

[.cnI redruM]

>>>>>Either the law rules or it doesn't. And in California and much of the liberal press, it doesn't.


Thank you, Bill O' Reilly. It's good to see that you are at least a demagogue with a conscience. As opposed to Gavin Newsome, who's merely a demagogue.

[expat_panama]

Ok, the left is hypocritical.  Is the right hypocritical too, or do we say that Judge Roy Moore out of line?

[Steve_Seattle]

I agree - even the O'Reilly bashers might have to concede he has a point here.

[Scenic Sounds]

Love him or hate him I think he hit the nail on the head with this article.

It's a clever piece, but here's the problem - most of the condemnation/criticism of Judge Moore followed his refusal to comply with court orders after the "rule of law" was determined. I suspect that when the City and County of San Francisco loses this case (as I believe it will), there will be compliance with whatever the courts decide.

[OldFriend]

Every once in a while O'R gets it right. Rarely tho lately.

[ravingnutter]

San Antonio Express-News

Typical for them...I tell their subscription people that call me that I would not read their liberal rag if they paid me. Disgusting piece of trash, not even fit for bird cage liner, the cheap ink that easily rubs off might make the bird sick.

[spodefly]

Yep, he is a blowhard, but he is exactly right on this one.

[hosepipe]

[ The rule of law--it's what America is based on ]

Rule of Law = Whatever 5 or the 9 say is SO, is SO... So let it be parsed so let it be enacted... Diana Ross is more of a Supreme than the Supremes...

[Uncle Hal]

The liberals, and their media friends, do not want facts to get in the way of their preconceived opinions.

[sauropod]

A "federal court order" is not necessarily law.

[jmstein7]

BINGO!

[NYCVirago]

Love him or hate him I think he hit the nail on the head with this article.

I've been down on O'Reilly lately, but I give him a big thumbs up for this column. It's among the best articles I've seen on this issue.

[satchmodog9]

Laws mean nothing to the libs. I remember Gephardt plugging some socialist legislation a year ago. There were many questions about the constitutionality of the bill and he said "it does not matter, this is a good law".

[varon]

BUMP

[pete anderson]

I wonder if O'Reilly would like to see Roy Moore and Gavin Newsome sharing a jail cell in a Federal Prison?

[nutmeg]

FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.