No Boy Scouts: The ACLU defends NAMBLA.

National Review Online ^ | February 27, 2004 | Deroy Murdock

[Tailgunner Joe]

BTTT

[longtermmemmory]

How to gain confidence of the parents? Sounds like what every democrat is doing with their opposition to the FMA and suport for homosexuals.

(except McCain, I think he lost it AGAIN)

[Victoria Delsoul]

Ohio's Court of Appeals found NAMBLA complicit in an earlier child-rape case. NAMBLA's literature, discovered in a defendant's possession, reflected "preparation and purpose," according to the Buckeye State's top bench.

The ACLU has offered material support to those who openly preach pedophilia and arguably encourage kidnapping, rape, and murder. Yet this legal group is energetically hostile to an organization that tries to turn boys into men, with sex alien to the process.

Clinton-appointed U.S. District Judge Napoleon Jones deemed the Boy Scouts a religious organization last July and declared that their involvement with Balboa Park violated the separation of church and state. The ACLU used this ruling to secure a settlement wherein the City of San Diego cancelled the Scouts' lease on the park, even though it did not expire until 2007 and, in fact, was extended in 2001 for 25 years. The ACLU also scored $950,000 in attorneys fees and court costs, thus fleecing taxpayers and deepening its pockets.

This is why it is imperative to elect a Republican President. Those who don't see the difference between Democrats and Republicans are naïve or corrupt.

[ppaul]

He wants back in.....

[King Prout]

there's nothing wrong with the ACLU and NAMBLA... that a little Napalm couldn't cure.

[genew]

Just think!

If you know an ACLU lawyer, you know somone who wants his or her own children to be sodomized.

Gramsci would be proud.

[little jeremiah]

Or some fatal diseases.

[WOSG]

I do not understand the ambivalence about ACLU. They have been vile and
dangerous and have preyed upon the laws and our Constitution like vultures ever since they were founded by Communists in the 1920s.
They have been directly responsible for most of the worst abuses in Judicial activism and the worst outrages in overbearing courts in the
last decades. It shouldnt take another outrage like their defense
of NAMBLA's incitement to murder to see that.

Nothing the ACLU has done has ever amounted to good for our nation and our civilization. Their defense of NAMBLA's aiding and abetting the rape and murder of boys as a 'free speech' case is typical, but just the latest outrage. They sued against the California recall vote - showing they really hate democracy when it may actually help republicans. They sue against religious free expression (Ten Commandments cases), and the freedom of association of the Boy Scouts. That was just last year.
Year in year out, these cultural marxists till the vineyards of moral
degradation to undermine America.

Roger Baldwin, co-founder of the ACLU, once said: "I seek social ownership of property, the abolition of the properties class,
and sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal.
It all sums up into one single purpose -- the abolition of dog-eat-dog
under which we live. I don't regret being part of the communist
tactic. I knew what I was doing. I was not an innocent liberal. I
wanted what the communists wanted and I traveled the United Front road
to get it."

Pro-Constitution civil-libertarian conservatives need to wake and smell the coffee: The ACLU is the most damaging political organization in the United States. The ACLU is out to destroy America, and have had pretty good success in their efforts!

[WOSG]

The ACLU claiming to defend 'freedom' is a total and utter sham.

The ACLU is the last and the most successful of the Communist Front organizations. (The Quaker "American Services Organization" is another but far less harmful and influential.)

[WOSG]

And note that forcing the Boy Scouts to accept homosexuals in that organization would very much serve the NAMBLA agenda.

[WOSG]

It should work that way, and good analogy. I thought of the same case myself.

Of course, skinheads and pedophiles are different on the Politically Correct scale of things.

But if it would undermine America to let them get away with it, you can be sure the ACLU would be there!

[Victoria Delsoul]

That's correct.

[spodefly]

Defending the twisted NAMBLA, trying to take down the Boy Scouts, and having the most obtuse interpretation of the 2nd Amendment -- The ACLU is not fighting for principles that I happen to believe in, however pious they may feel about upholding their interpretation of the constitution.

[Tamzee]

I met Mr. Curley several months after Jeffrey's death when we spoke at an event together regarding child predators. He has become an American hero for speaking out against these monsters and fighting to stop NAMBLA.

[goldstategop]

The ACLU would try to get "The Passion" banned if they thought the government had a hand in it. That's how whacked out they are. Its too bad they can't join PETA in saving a whale.

[fishbabe]

i tried goggle for more info on tom metzger.....interesting stuff.the jury awarded mulgeta seraw[the black guy ] family 12.5 million dollars ..tom metzger and his son john had to pay 7 million of that award,and the two skinheads who did the killing only had to pay 500,000 each....tom metzger and his son were punished for inciting violence..the aclu was nowhere to be found....

[chatham]

I just read in Michael Savage's book the "Enemy within" that Ruth Bader Ginsberg was Chief Councel for the A.C.L.U.
What a "GREAT" background to be on the Supreme Court.
If that is the Standard then Stalin, Hitler and Castro would have been good Candidates by the Slugs that chose Ginsberg.

[King Prout]

too slow, more's the pity.

[little jeremiah]

One never knows what the future holds.

The law of karma exists, whether someone believes it or not, or understands it or not. "As you sow, so shall you reap" - sometimes people who identify as Christians think that "karma" is something foreign or not applicable. It's just a law of the universe.

Sometimes it happens immediately, sometimes down the road. But eventually, if one plays with fire, one gets burned. If one practices same sex acts, one has to pay the (heavy) price. If people support such perversity, even at the expense of ordered society, the price is very heavy.

In the universal order, no one ever "gets away" with anything.

Ultimately, justice and mercy are the same thing, and they are inescapable. It has nothing to do with anyone's beliefs.

[King Prout]

The only problem with shrugging and relying on "karma" and the notion of "if one plays with fire..." is that along the way a great many innocents get harmed, a great many houses besides that of the arsonist burn down.