[Dead Corpse]

Try re-reading the text of the amendment. It purposes no new bans UNTIL AFTER THE TWO YEAR STUDY IS COMPLETE. Otherwise, the only thing it does is strengthen the penalty against crimes used with already banned ammo.

Do I like it? No. I want LESS gun laws, not more bullsh*t like this. Is it a deal killer? No. Should people call their Senators and try to convince them to reconsider this before fianl passage of the Bill... most definately. If the Bill passes with this tacked on, your Reps should be called and tell them to strip it in committee.

Let's just make sure we know exactly WHAT we are getting our buns in an uproar over. H'mkay?

[gatex]

"Let's just make sure we know exactly WHAT we are getting our buns in an uproar over. H'mkay?"

Why don't you list them 1,2, 3 etc., so we can all be on the same page.

Senator Craig's office told me "possession."

[skip2myloo]

We don't need no steenkin' study to know that this proposal is contrary to common sense as well as to the Second Amendment.

Buy time for two years, BS !!

We need somebody with the cohones to tell FatTeddy to stuff it.

The NRA, and it's director Craig, need to go back to the original Bush/NRA position -- S. 1805 needs to go forward as a "clean bill."