Father who married daughter ordered back to prison

customwire.ap.org ^

[chance33_98]

Father who married daughter ordered back to prison

MOBILE, Ala. (AP) -- A 53-year-old man was sent back to prison after a judge decided the man had violated a probation order barring him from cohabitation with his 30-year-old daughter, who is also his former wife.

Mobile County Circuit Judge John Lockett ordered Carroll Eugene Ferdinandsen to prison on Thursday after determining he violated a probation order barring him from cohabitation with Alice Ferdinandsen.

Each had pleaded guilty to incest last summer in connection with their May 2003 civil marriage in Mobile County and served six months in jail before being released in January.

Prosecutors presented police witnesses who testified they found the father and daughter together in motel rooms on two occasions, just days after the couple's release from jail.

Each had pleaded guilty to incest last summer and served six months in jail before being released in January.

Lockett ordered Carroll Ferdinandsen to serve the remainder of a 10-year sentence.

The judge said the state had not proved its case against Alice Ferdinandsen and ruled she had not violated her probation.

[skinkinthegrass]

Hmmm.... I'd be curious to ask liberals about this. After all, isn't it a "loving, stable relationship between two consenting adults"?

...down the slippery slope. If its' just "loving, stable relationship between two consenting adults" the standard..I'm sure "Rover" would approve...or another step down, N.A.M.B.L.A.

.."What ever happen to Democratic Party?...it got flushed Down the Toilet Bowl"

[Colonel_Flagg]

In light of recent developments in San Francisco, isn't it discrimination and a violation of civil rights to bar two adults from consensual activities?

Perhaps he'd need to marry his son. Ugh.

[nathanbedford]

So a state legislature which chooses to prohibit sodomy committed in private violates the constitution. Likewise a legislature which undertakes to protect the unborn from abortion.

Since Roe v. Wade the Supreme Court has embarked us all on a path of jurisprudence which has virtually nothing to do with the constitution but everything to do with public relations. So, establish your cause, ie sodomy, as the flovor of the week and you get constitutional protection. Fail to do so, ie protection of the unborn or incest, and you go to jail. The supremes get to decide what is the flavor of the week - not your elected representatives.

I think the Utah supremes ought to up the ante in this circus and legalize polygamy, which is still practiced, and watch the federal supremes flip... I mean distinguish this flavor of the week.

The full faith and credit clause has more than one application.

[lilylangtree]

Sickos! Civil queer marriages and now civil incest marriages. Yuck!

[sheik yerbouty]

Nah. Hope Arkansas.

[jimt]

In light of recent developments in San Francisco, isn't it discrimination and a violation of civil rights to bar two adults from consensual activities?

After all, once you've opened the door to one kind of deviation you have no grounds to close it to other kinds.

Right?

Why only two? And as far as adults go, animals and inanimate objects should not be discriminated against either.

A male-male-male-female relationship, or a male-dog relationship or a female-rock relationship has all the legitimacy of a male-male or female-female relationship, IMHO.

It isn't a slippery slope, it's a cliff.

[skinkinthegrass]

..we here in Ma. have our limits.

That is, Until Rep. Bwarny Fwank (Ma-Aberrant) is anointed/appointed/elected as Senator... :))

[GovernmentShrinker]

I advocate the government getting the heck out of the homes and beds of all consenting adults. Nobody needs a marriage license from the government, or any other kind of permission. Who the heck cares what these two consenting adults do? I think they're nuts, but it's none of my business, and I sure don't want any of my tax dollars spent by police and courts attempting to keep them away from each other.

[Ursus arctos horribilis]

You must be a Yankee, so I suggest you see the documentry movie (it's out on DVD) "Brother's Keeper". If you want redneck hillbilly sexual perverts (five over 50's brothers) sleeping in the same filthy bed in the same filthy room.

Oh, did I mention this is in Hillary's upstate New Yawk, and the local people did all in their power to get the one off for murdering his (shared lover) brother. So it was not an isolated hill billy event, check out the delivery of live bacon spurting blood after being shot and stuck with a "pig" sticker in a horse trailer"

Methinks all pompous arsed Yankees need to check out their neighbors there in New Yawk (makes the fictional homosexual cast of "Deliverance" look refined) before shooting off mouths about West Viginny hill billys.

[BlueLancer]

"...or a female-rock relationship ..."

Sorry, this is just silly ...

Now, a female-cucumber relationship would be allowed.

[DM1]

lol maybe but lets just say that if they do legalize it, i would not be surprised

[Servant of the 9]

Maybe the "Defense of Marriage Ammendment" had best limit marriage to a man and a woman not otherwise related. At present, it wouldn't prevent Mass from legalizing this kind of thing.

SO9

[Glenn]

can't even recognize the remark as a joke

It's no joke if your mother, grandmother and great grandmother are born and raised West Virginians. You should have some respect.

[68 grunt]

Nah. Hope Arkansas.

There you go! Won't have to move the trailer so far ;^)

[68 grunt]

You must be a Yankee ...

Nope, even more superior to a West-by God'er, Virginia :^>

[68 grunt]

Just a Jews have to accept their history, so must West Virginians.

Dang, this is too much fun, but I'm teasing a friend of mine in WVA and I'm hurting other peoples feelings. West Virginia is indeed a fine state, as are all 50 of the rascals.

[Glenn]

Just a Jews have to accept their history, so must West Virginians.

Quit while you are ahead, Ace.

[68 grunt]

Thanks for the advice, Duece.

[cinFLA]

We believe that adults have the right to private choice in consensual sexual activity.

We oppose any government attempt to dictate, prohibit, control, or encourage any private lifestyle, living arrangement or contractual relationship.

We support repeal of existing laws and policies which are intended to condemn, affirm, encourage, or deny sexual lifestyles or any set of attitudes about such lifestyles.