Replies

How sad for you. That you equate a Father's duty to his child as somehow reflecting a LAZY Mother. Working full time, raising children ALONE, and trying to help them grow into productive adults is sure LAZY. But the LAZY Father can't even share a little of his income to help. I guess getting state supported shild care for working Mothers is a better way to care for your child, huh. That's it, teach them that the STATE takes place of the Father. Like it or not, when the Father was in the home, the child felt secure in the support provided by his income. How do you answer your child when he says daddy I need school clothes, if you would pay MY child support I could get them?

Your answer is tell your LAZY Mother to get them.

Not sad for me at all. Very sad for the children. Dragged around by lazy women looking for a greener pasture with more money and hotter sex. The children with price tags on their heads. The children are taught by these mothers that their value is money. God bless the children.

"How do you answer your child when he says daddy I need school clothes, if you would pay MY child support I could get them?"

When you pay $1600.00 child support per month for 2 children to a Mother who is already making $45,000 per year,
and the kids have to ask Dad for decent clothes,

HOW DO YOU ANSWER THEM?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How do you answer your child when he says daddy I need school clothes, if you would pay MY child support I could get them?

I'd take the kid shopping and buy him whatever he needs.

The amounts awarded for child support usually far exceed the costs of caring for the child. That "over and above" money is the problem. It rewards women in a totally unfair way. The extra dough isn't spent on the kid. It's spent on the woman.

Working full time, raising children ALONE, and trying to help them grow into productive adults is sure LAZY.

Then give ME the child. I'm a hypothetical, re-married father paying support to a single mother who has serial boyfriends, drinks too much, has a filthy house and has no aspirations of raising my child in a wholesome environment.

But the LAZY Father can't even share a little of his income to help.

This hypothetical LAZY Father would be glad to have the child. This LAZY Father is happy to pay support for the child but doesn't feel $1500 a month is what it really costs to raise a child; and the courts seem to take every last dollar of disposable income so the LAZY Father has nothing left to save for his retirement, or his other children's college education.

On the other hand, the mother has the burden (and privelege) or raising the child alone; the burden of paying for daycare; being a single mother is one of the most difficult human undertakings.

Maybe these are some one of the reasons God hates divorce.

The issue is so contentious, with liberal courts typically so punitive, PUNITIVE (not supportive) in their assessments of custody and support. It creates bitter and destructive animosity between parents, with the children getting caught up in it all.