Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Don Joe
Why not? They do it all the time with eminent domain and civil forfeiture.

Eminent domain still requires just compensation. Civil forfeiture happens AFTER you are convicted of a crime. It is part of a formal sentence following due process.

267 posted on 02/28/2004 12:02:35 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]


To: Myrddin
Eminent domain still requires just compensation.

In theory, sure.

In practice, it ain't happening.

Civil forfeiture happens AFTER you are convicted of a crime. It is part of a formal sentence following due process.

Garcon! I'll have whatever he's smoking.

269 posted on 02/28/2004 12:08:57 PM PST by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

To: Myrddin
Civil forfeiture happens AFTER you are convicted of a crime.

Not always.

You might want to check the record at FEAR.

270 posted on 02/28/2004 12:12:01 PM PST by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

To: Myrddin
Civil forfeiture happens AFTER you are convicted of a crime. It is part of a formal sentence following due process.

They could just as easily charge the ammo with a crime. They've done that already with firearms suspected of being used in "drug crimes". Those folks have to sue to get their guns back, even if they, the actual humans, are never convicted of a crime, and often they run out of money before the goverment runs out of yours. The politically incorrect parts of the fifth amendment are in no better oder with the policritters than the entire second amendment is.

279 posted on 02/28/2004 2:39:47 PM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

To: Myrddin
"Civil forfeiture happens AFTER you are convicted of a crime. It is part of a formal sentence following due process. "

Don't forget the Emerson case and federal law -- a restraining order can make it illegal to possess ammunition or firearms. Emerson was not convicted of a crime and the District Judge said Emerson had made no threat against his wife (he did threaten to the wife to harm her lover, but that is not included in the fed law.) [ U.S. Code title 18, section 922(g)]

286 posted on 02/28/2004 3:43:50 PM PST by gatex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson