To: TERMINATTOR; philetus; claudiustg; tpaine; Paleo Conservative; ahadams2; Richard-SIA; GeronL; ...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1086587/posts?page=26#26 Read and compare the current law and the proposed changes. There is NO provision in Craig's amendment that redefines AP ammunition. He is proposing legislation to STUDY the feasibility of coming up with a AP standard.
Angel Shamaya has gone off half cocked with little information on this one.
109 posted on
02/27/2004 8:31:46 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
"There is NO provision in Craig's amendment that redefines AP ammunition."
I don't care. Armor piercing ammunition shouldn't be defined or regulated period. The idea here is to put in place a law that allows for re-definition later.
It's only a matter of time.
1. Definitions.
a) Armor piercing ammunition shall now be construed to mean any ammunition capable of piercing body armor made of wet toilet paper.
2. Possession Prohibited. Armor piercing ammuntion may not be possessed by anyone not wearing government jackboots.
Why is our alleged side proposing anything but eliminating regulations that define or regulate AP ammo?
151 posted on
02/27/2004 2:01:00 PM PST by
agitator
(...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Searching for the solution to a non-existent problem!
RKBA does not allow "Armor Piercing" ammunition to be regulated.
272 posted on
02/28/2004 12:26:59 PM PST by
Richard-SIA
(Nuke the U.N!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson